Zach Smith was not acting in the course and scope of his employment when he beat his wife. Do you believe head coaches should be punished for the acts of their assistants outside of their duties - a.PSU running back coach gets a DUI while on a frolic of his own and Franklin gets punished? And would this apply to everyone, or just Meyer?
If it was a DUI that got someone injured. And/or if Franklin then tried to sweep it under that table and/or then say he never knew about it....
Yeah. He should have his ass canned.
The head coach is only responsible for the workplace.and his own conduct. So it is only the second half that justifies discipline.
Nitpicking is something I have to admit you do well.
His ass should've been canned.
I realize analysing an issue and thinking it through, as opposed to gut reactions you feel obligated to stick with even when facts change or your assumptions are wrong, is a problem for you. Discipline is related to personal responsibility. Head coaches are not responsible for the off work conduct of their staff. They are responsible for how they deal with it in the work place.
You have presented zero facts that change anything.
You keep hammering at the same bent nail you mis-hit the first time when you chimed in. These efforts have not gone unnoticed by me. Bravo.
You're opinion(and that is all you've presented)is not mine. Have you ever considered simply using the phrase 'we disagree'?
I freely recognize that you think your brilliance in subtly changing the parameters of what is being said is undecipherable on other peoples part. And to many I'm sure it is.
I'm just not one of them.
Poll
