Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

0 (0%)

No

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 0

Voting closed: October 22, 2020, 02:05:59 PM

[CaptainCargo]

B1G to stay at 9 conference games.
Alliance with ACC and/or Pac12 not in the cards.

M O N E Y .

[Espnthree]

B1G to stay at 9 conference games.
Alliance with ACC and/or Pac12 not in the cards.

M O N E Y .

Of course. 
This is a business and the B1G is the best at it.

[CaptainCargo]

Arguable.

 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships. In football alone they fall far short of the SEC, as they have won 13 out of the last 15.

[Espnthree]

Arguable.



 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships.

You mean to compete for a National Championship.
That is a season long battle with no great difference, moneywise, after reaching the final four.
Which is why the B1G needs no help from the PAC12 or the ACC.

[Hairy Lime]

Arguable.

 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships. In football alone they fall far short of the SEC, as they have won 13 out of the last 15.

11.

[CaptainCargo]

Arguable.



 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships.

You mean to compete for a National Championship.
That is a season long battle with no great difference, moneywise, after reaching the final four.
Which is why the B1G needs no help from the PAC12 or the ACC.

No I mean WIN a National Championship. And there is a big difference as college football isn't college basketball Jimmy.

[CaptainCargo]

Arguable.

 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships. In football alone they fall far short of the SEC, as they have won 13 out of the last 15.

11.

Okay. And the big has won 1.

[bosox26d]

Why are there so many of the lengthy spam posts showing up all over the forums. I thought that was fixed years ago but they're back in annoying force

[kidcarter8]

I dont see any spam posts.

[Hairy Lime]

Arguable.

 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships. In football alone they fall far short of the SEC, as they have won 13 out of the last 15.

11.

Okay. And the big has won 1.

Which is why your original exaggeration was pointless.

[bosox26d]

I dont see any spam posts.

I've been reporting them. At first they were just hitting dead forums but now they're targeting active ones. There was one here today

[josh]

Why are there so many of the lengthy spam posts showing up all over the forums. I thought that was fixed years ago but they're back in annoying force

I presume that the spam generators found a workaround for the sign up security, since the security seems to still be in place. It would probably take an update to get newer spam blockers, but I don't have the authority/ability to do that.

[josh]

I dont see any spam posts.

I've been reporting them. At first they were just hitting dead forums but now they're targeting active ones. There was one here today

I appreciate the reports, since there are fora I go into far less frequently and would not otherwise see them.

You can skip reporting the ones in Business and Tech, though. The only non-spam activity it receives the vast bulk of the time are silly responses to the spam posts. I don't lock it because I figure they will just target a different place.

[CaptainCargo]

Arguable.

 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships. In football alone they fall far short of the SEC, as they have won 13 out of the last 15.

11.

Okay. And the big has won 1.

Which is why your original exaggeration was pointless.

Pointless to you and Jimmy. Possibly not pointless to others.

[Hairy Lime]

Arguable.

 At least if part of the reason for the money is ultimately to win national championships. In football alone they fall far short of the SEC, as they have won 13 out of the last 15.

11.

Okay. And the big has won 1.

Which is why your original exaggeration was pointless.

Pointless to you and Jimmy. Possibly not pointless to others.

So what precisely is the point of exaggerating a case that the actual facts make quite well?