Ah yes, the old strawman. Me being sick of your hammering on the same fact ten thousand times equated to me not valuing facts. Uh huh.
Surely you've watched an argument where both parties circle back endlessly to the same tired points and you've wished they'd just shut up and move on. Or at least one of them would, thus depriving the argument of oxygen.
In this spectator role, I think it's possible you reached a point where you didn't care who's right.
Bart
allow me to quote you verbatim on this subject.
No one gives a flying fuck anymore if you have facts on your side
Where's the strawman?
If you don't like me sticking to facts, what would you prefer?
A year ago Larry posted a misleading link and I called it misleading, and the discussion should have been over then, but Larry got defensive and doubled down. And yesterday for reasons still unknown brought up the subject again.
And I responded to him, honestly.
And you blame me.
Should I nod and agree with Larry, when I know he's either made a mistake or is bullshitting the forum?
Or should I challenge him as I do Utley, kid and Red and others?
Why should I treat Larry differently, Bart?
Maybe that's the issue you the Elba Social Justice Warriors should focus on.
And barring the next salvo, I'll STFU on the subject, as there is nothing new to be discovered, and you can get back to the circle jerk.
Poll
