poor troll
He loses an argument in every way possible and fully exposes not only his inferiority complex (well-earned) and his obssession with Boston, but his deep ignorance about the game, its history, the stats, everything.
Yet despite his thrashing he comes back for more.
the troll is scrappy.
As posted before the troll decided to dumb down this discussion, I think Aaron was a great player, among the greatest, but he's not really in the debate for the greatest hitter.
That debate has generally been reserved for Ruth or Williams.
I think a case can be made for either, and there are additional extenuating arguments that have to be made for both, though I tilt slightly for Ruth.
"As to the best hitters hit", yes, and thats why OPS, as already pointed out to the troll, is the best indicator, as it combines the several elements critical to a hitters success, show patience, a good eye, an ability to hit, and get on base and ultimately score.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/onbase_plus_slugging_career.shtml it captures the real goal of a hitter to put your team in the best position to score runs.
the troll does not understand this about a game so driven by stats.
Interestingly enough, on this leaders list, "Most Outs Made", neither Ruth nor Williams are on it, but lots of very good and some greats are on it.
Rose and Aaron then Yaz top it.
https://www.baseball-reference.com/leaders/outs_made_career.shtmlbut you have to play a long time to fail so often.
The troll in that regard is the exception to the rule, he fails all the time.