Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

0 (0%)

No

1 (100%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Voting closed: October 22, 2020, 02:04:36 PM

[kidcarter8]

Flacco fares pretty well vs Pats, if I recall.

[kidcarter8]

Pats draft look

https://sports.yahoo.com/2021-nfl-mock-draft-roundup-180232282.html

[bankshot1]

Flacco fares pretty well vs Pats, if I recall.

1-4 regular season

2-2 post-season.

total 3-6



good chance these teams will not meet in the post-season.

[josh]

Flacco fares pretty well vs Pats, if I recall.

1-4 regular season

2-2 post-season.

total 3-6



good chance these teams will not meet in the post-season.

I have long thought that the two worst NFL teams in a given year should meet post-season. I figured they could call it the Toilet Bowl and play each year in Flushing Meadows.

Or that the worst NFL team could play the winner of the NCAA championship.

[kidcarter8]

Flacco underappreciated overall

Needs 2 wins for 100 regular season, career

10-5 in playoffs

As for games with Pats, his stats are higher on average in those games than overall (66% comp rate in his 1-4 reg season log, for instance vs 61.5 career)

[kidcarter8]

Name the 17 modern day QBs with 100 wins in regular season

Hints if u need them

[josh]

Name the 17 modern day QBs with 100 wins in regular season

Hints if u need them

Brady
Manning
Manning
Rodgers
Brees
Luck
Rivers
Marino
Bledsoe
Montana
Young
Simms
Staubach
Bradshaw
Elway
Wilson
Favre

Off the top of my head. No idea if I have some I should not or have left off some I should not have. I imagine I have.

[josh]

I listed four who were in the 90s and one in the 80s. I left off one I should have remembered, one I might have eventually come up with, and a few that I would not have included in the "modern era," suggesting that I just don't know what that term means.

And one just way off that I should not have had at all. Bad luck on my part.

[kidcarter8]

Bledsoe tied with Flacco at 98

[kidcarter8]

You missed at least 5

[kidcarter8]

There was a lot of bad football played yesterday.

Fortunately, we have the Pats and Jets tonight.

That will make it all better, right?!

Howard and Dandy Don weep

I see the line os the game is Pats -9.5 or -10

I'm not sure the Pats can score much more than 15 (that's 5 FG-I'm not sure they can score TD anymore)

I generally like overs, but if I were to wager I'd give a hard look at the Jets and the under (42)

I see 3 offensive TDs for Pats

No Newton turnovers

Take the over on Pats' number

[kidcarter8]

9-4, 5-8, -$480

[Hamilton Samuels]

Randall Cunningham on that list?

[bankshot1]

eyeballing Josh's QB list

not sure what "modern day" means but

I'd add old-school QBs Johnny U and maybe Fran Tarkenton and Bart Starr

and not sure of Russell Wilson

[bankshot1]

There was a lot of bad football played yesterday.

Fortunately, we have the Pats and Jets tonight.

That will make it all better, right?!

Howard and Dandy Don weep

I see the line os the game is Pats -9.5 or -10

I'm not sure the Pats can score much more than 15 (that's 5 FG-I'm not sure they can score TD anymore)

I generally like overs, but if I were to wager I'd give a hard look at the Jets and the under (42)

I see 3 offensive TDs for Pat's

No Newton turnovers

Take the over on Pat's number

I see a low-scoring field position game with a lot of rushing, a lot of punting, and a game that gets over quick.

something like 17-13 Pats,

I'd take the 10