boz
i recall shortly after Clemson disemboweled the Sons of Bear Bryant, in the Student-Athlete Football championship, I had a brief conversation with your buddy Deej. who initially insisted the game was closer than the blowout it was. (a 28 pt win), and he cherry picked some stats which were quickly and easily debunked and the debate was for all intents and purposes over. Clemson kicked their ass, no ifs and or buts, whether it was really a 21 point win or a 35 point win. There was Bear carcass all over Santa Clara.
Having said that I would argue that anyone watching the AFC championship OT game could successfully argue based on the voluminous game stats that the game was not as close as the scoreboard indicated.
Pats pitched a 14-0 shutout in the 1st half and it could have and should have been worse.
The 2nd half was closer and was marred by some calls/non-calls, and a fucking gift TD that briefly gave a led to the Chiefs, but justice prevailed and the better team won.
And the game stats, clearly showed that domination.
Below is a link to the game stats, they're worth a look.
they pretty much spell out how dominant the pats were, but also the expensive cost of turnovers.
http://www.espn.com/nfl/matchup?gameId=401038850Troll's sad story is always the same, the Pats cheated/the game was fixed.
he appears to be the only one who can't handle the truth.
SSDD