Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Yes

0 (0%)

No

1 (100%)

Total Members Voted: 1

Voting closed: October 22, 2020, 02:04:36 PM

[kidcarter8]

Pretty sure this is not Pats problem right now

[josh]

Pretty sure this is not Pats problem right now

The game would have been totally different had we gotten that TD instead of a turnover there.

We'd be down 26 to 10.

Clearly a QB problem.

[josh]

Held them under 50!

[kiidcarter8]

Pretty sure this is not Pats problem right now

The game would have been totally different had we gotten that TD instead of a turnover there.

We'd be down 26 to 10.

Clearly a QB problem.

To be expected

[bankshot1]

Miami had the no-name defense in the 70s

Pats unveiled the no-show D last night.

there was a D in the Dolphins, there is no D on the Pats.

I thought the Pats would lose last night but not to piss themselves.

Poor ending to a decent season.

[Hamilton Samuels]

The Pats lost because the Bills were better, played better, and played with more confidence and commitment.

It's okay to acknowledge when another team beats you, instead of making excuses that your QB or D blew the game.

But then, Bostonian sportsmanship does not exist.



Heh

[josh]

The Pats lost because the Bills were better, played better, and played with more confidence and commitment.

It's okay to acknowledge when another team beats you, instead of making excuses that your QB or D blew the game.

But then, Bostonian sportsmanship does not exist.



Heh

Same old Ham.

Only you can read what either Banks or me wrote and get that interpretation from it.

Here, let me make this easy for you:

The Pats 'offense was outplayed.
The Pats' defense was outplayed.
The Pats' special teams were outplayed.

(I wrote "our" but know you object to that, too.)

It was an uglier game than the beating the Eagles took today.

[CaptainCargo]

Some piss poor decisions by the Niner's coaching staff but they pull it out.

[CaptainCargo]

Miami had the no-name defense in the 70s

Pats unveiled the no-show D last night.

there was a D in the Dolphins, there is no D on the Pats.

I thought the Pats would lose last night but not to piss themselves.

Poor ending to a decent season.

Yeah there was a lot on the young Pat QB. A little defense by the Patriots would have helped immensely.

[Hamilton Samuels]

The Pats lost because the Bills were better, played better, and played with more confidence and commitment.

It's okay to acknowledge when another team beats you, instead of making excuses that your QB or D blew the game.

But then, Bostonian sportsmanship does not exist.



Heh

Same old Ham.

Only you can read what either Banks or me wrote and get that interpretation from it.

Here, let me make this easy for you:

The Pats 'offense was outplayed.
The Pats' defense was outplayed.
The Pats' special teams were outplayed.

(I wrote "our" but know you object to that, too.)

It was an uglier game than the beating the Eagles took today.

Get defensive much?

[Hamilton Samuels]

Go, Chiefs. Get Ben The Rapist out.

[josh]

The Pats lost because the Bills were better, played better, and played with more confidence and commitment.

It's okay to acknowledge when another team beats you, instead of making excuses that your QB or D blew the game.

But then, Bostonian sportsmanship does not exist.



Heh

Same old Ham.

Only you can read what either Banks or me wrote and get that interpretation from it.

Here, let me make this easy for you:

The Pats 'offense was outplayed.
The Pats' defense was outplayed.
The Pats' special teams were outplayed.

(I wrote "our" but know you object to that, too.)

It was an uglier game than the beating the Eagles took today.

Get defensive much?

Didn't you watch the game?

They got defensive never.

[bankshot1]

Miami had the no-name defense in the 70s

Pats unveiled the no-show D last night.

there was a D in the Dolphins, there is no D on the Pats.

I thought the Pats would lose last night but not to piss themselves.

Poor ending to a decent season.

Yeah there was a lot on the young Pat QB. A little defense by the Patriots would have helped immensely.

The Pats only real chance for a win was a sloppy/ smash mouth game with turnovers and mistakes and punts that pinned the Bills deep and maybe they could eke out a 17-14 win. But the Pats D no showed and they were trampled by a deeper and better Bills team that was prepared to go to war. The Pats were preparing for golf in Cancun. They peed themselves.

Bama Mac was along for the ride this year and he showed reasonably well (arm strength aside) next year the stakes are upped and we'll see what we got.

[kidcarter8]

2-4 last week vs number after finishing reg season strong (4-2 money line)

Saturday, Jan. 21, 1:05 PM TN -3.5 Bengals 47    23-22 Cincy
Saturday, Jan. 21, 4:40 PM GB -6 49ers 47.5       28-24 Packers
Sunday, Jan. 22, 1:05 PM TB -3 Rams 48.5        28-24 Bucs
Sunday, Jan. 22, 4:40 PM KC -2.5 Bills 55          27-24 Chiefs

Actually laid some futures cash out on GB to win SB and Cincy to win AFC.

[bankshot1]

had a decent WC week at 4-2 and a decent year ending the regular season a few games over .500 and clinging to a modest lead in the SoSH ATS pool heading into the divisional round.

still mulling over picks.

leaning home favs tomorrow, may 2nd guess myself and go Cincy at +3.5 (I hate that hook, and I haven't had them right all year), and I'm brutal at last minute switches (like 2-8)

I kind of like GB to bring another title to title town, and they're the ML favorite, but Rodgers is such a dick its tough to root for the guy.

I'm still rooting for TB12, old habits etc. though I'm not sure he can beat the Rams this time