It has to do with this bit of ignorant foolishness you subscribed to: "Biden knows he is losing because otherwise he would not have agreed to a debate". Your typically dishonest attempt to lie about the point notwithstanding.Every one.So to be clear: every incumbent since Ford has agreed to debates with their major party opponent. Every. One.Joe BidenSo an incumbent agreeing to a debate knows he is losing? Like...The challenger always wants to debate the incumbent.Bill Maher recognizes the Emperors clothingTrump wanted to debate too, and had been speaking about it for months. So what conclusion would you draw from that?
T o me it says Biden knows he is losing because otherwise he would not have agreed to a debate. Only the loser wants to debate.
If you want to change the subject, as you usually do, have at it.
But you suck at history and research.
2020 Trump, the incumbent, was the clear underdog in a pandemic year. Still, he picked up 7 million votes
from his 2016 Count.
Obama in 2012 was in a statistical tie with Romney, the challenger
Bush in 2004 was tied with Gore
Clinton in 1996 had a huge lead over Dole but it was a three way race with Perot.
No incumbent would leave the debate stage to two opponents
Bush in 1992 also three way.
Reagan in 1984 landslide in the polls and the voting but Reagan was fighting back from high inflation in his first term.
What that has to do with my previous statement is known only to you.
the challenger always wants to debate the incumbent.
Escape from Elba
- May 20, 2024, 12:47:15 PM
- Welcome, Guest
News:
1
on: Today at 12:44:42 PM
|
||
Started by josh - Last post by Hairy Lime | ||
|
3
on: Today at 12:32:10 PM
|
||
Started by josh - Last post by jmmengel | ||
Every one.So to be clear: every incumbent since Ford has agreed to debates with their major party opponent. Every. One.Joe BidenSo an incumbent agreeing to a debate knows he is losing? Like...The challenger always wants to debate the incumbent.Bill Maher recognizes the Emperors clothingTrump wanted to debate too, and had been speaking about it for months. So what conclusion would you draw from that? What that has to do with my previous statement is known only to you. the challenger always wants to debate the incumbent. |
4
on: Today at 12:14:35 PM
|
||
Started by josh - Last post by Hairy Lime | ||
So to be clear: every incumbent since Ford has agreed to debates with their major party opponent. Every. One.Joe BidenSo an incumbent agreeing to a debate knows he is losing? Like...The challenger always wants to debate the incumbent.Bill Maher recognizes the Emperors clothingTrump wanted to debate too, and had been speaking about it for months. So what conclusion would you draw from that? |
6
on: Today at 12:03:27 PM
|
||
Started by josh - Last post by jmmengel | ||
Joe BidenSo an incumbent agreeing to a debate knows he is losing? Like...The challenger always wants to debate the incumbent.Bill Maher recognizes the Emperors clothingTrump wanted to debate too, and had been speaking about it for months. So what conclusion would you draw from that? If you want to change the subject, as you usually do, have at it. But you suck at history and research. 2020 Trump, the incumbent, was the clear underdog in a pandemic year. Still, he picked up 7 million votes from his 2016 Count. Obama in 2012 was in a statistical tie with Romney, the challenger Bush in 2004 was tied with Gore Clinton in 1996 had a huge lead over Dole but it was a three way race with Perot. No incumbent would leave the debate stage to two opponents Bush in 1992 also three way. Reagan in 1984 landslide in the polls and the voting but Reagan was fighting back from high inflation in his first term. |