Hey! bambu, is this you?
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5146471/Hunt-man-stole-5-000-SEX-DOLL-adult-store.html
http://www.salon.com/2019/12/05/beyond-conspiracy-theory-trump-and-the-republicans-are-waging-an-all-out-war-on-reality/
Bambi was among the first victims of the English language bullshit empire.
Red is vying to retroactively become patient 0.
Reality is...
China will likely have taken over the world by 2100.
Many people seem to have seen it, and are living for 'today' not 'tomorrow'.
China is allegedly building coal-fired power stations as fast as it can go.
So are India, Japan and many others.
Fail
http://www.salon.com/2019/12/05/beyond-conspiracy-theory-trump-and-the-republicans-are-waging-an-all-out-war-on-reality/
Bambi was among the first victims of the English language bullshit empire.
Red is vying to retroactively become patient 0.
• The Earth is heated by the flux of energy it receives from the Sun, and cools down by emitting infrared radiation to space.
#####
Simple really, no degree from Harvard needed for this one either.
Sunlight heats ground. Heat, longwave radiation, then radiates back to space. A pure nitrogen and oxygen atmosphere would let all that IR radiation pass through. Some molecules, however, like nitrogen oxide, methane, and CO2, absorb longwave photons and increase their rate of vibration. This increase in kinetic energy is called "heat" -- those molecules are thus retaining energy that would otherwise escape into space. As these molecules are singularly good at trapping heat, they cause a rise in near-surface temperatures when their concentrations go up. Basic physics and chemistry. High school students do basic experiments, like Tyndall's 1859 experiment that easily demonstrate this effect.
The last 150 years of science have advanced our knowledge of how this works, as well as proved other principles on which you daily assert your unquestioning faith when you step aboard a jet, take a pill, drive a car, flip on your tv, log onto the Net, etc. Why then does this basic 19th century science pose such a problem?
Because people are lying to you, by misrepresenting science and its findings.
Then in that case, it's too late.
Carbon emissions are only going to keep on increasing from now until at least 2100...no matter what.
Overpopulation, which no one wants to know about.
Roll over. Play dead.
You're wrong about climate change and wrong about emissions. And we can only hope that emissions are a consideration in 2100. But if we follow your lead either way, we're more screwed than if we ignore you.
So every country in the world understands and believes in climate change. Almost every credible scientist is convinced as well.
But one political party in the US, supported by religious folk who don't go in for science and Big Oil and other major polluters, doesn't buy it.
So which is more likely: that the entire world, nearly 200 countries and 7 billion people, plus all the world's scientists are mistaken or have been duped. Or that right-wing folks in the US believe climate change is a hoax because it conflicts with their religious views or their source of income (or because the party they support denies climate change mostly for those two reasons)?
This is a serious legit question.
Furthermore, taking action now to reduce greenhouse gasses will still reduce pollution and have vast health benefits even if manmade climate change somehow is wrong or irreversible.
The supposed economic downside to reducing greenhouse gasses and witching off of fossil fuels are likely more than offset by the new green jobs created, the health benefits of breathing clean air, along with the reduction in petroleum spills and accidents (bet ya a pipeline somewhere leaked today!)
• The Earth is heated by the flux of energy it receives from the Sun, and cools down by emitting infrared radiation to space.
#####
Simple really, no degree from Harvard needed for this one either.
Sunlight heats ground. Heat, longwave radiation, then radiates back to space. A pure nitrogen and oxygen atmosphere would let all that IR radiation pass through. Some molecules, however, like nitrogen oxide, methane, and CO2, absorb longwave photons and increase their rate of vibration. This increase in kinetic energy is called "heat" -- those molecules are thus retaining energy that would otherwise escape into space. As these molecules are singularly good at trapping heat, they cause a rise in near-surface temperatures when their concentrations go up. Basic physics and chemistry. High school students do basic experiments, like Tyndall's 1859 experiment that easily demonstrate this effect.
The last 150 years of science have advanced our knowledge of how this works, as well as proved other principles on which you daily assert your unquestioning faith when you step aboard a jet, take a pill, drive a car, flip on your tv, log onto the Net, etc. Why then does this basic 19th century science pose such a problem?
Because people are lying to you, by misrepresenting science and its findings.
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/11/25/headlines/coal_industry_knew_burning_fossil_fuels_causes_climate_change_as_early_as_1966?fbclid=IwAR2eDF-zHAtKv2UsB6QAKnzzNqXdBwj20bB0lMVzVdG-uC34yombrel3uS8
Kid and Bambu still don't accept man-made climate change. Ward still thinks it can be responded to by half-measures.
The globe heats, and cools, all by itself.
The glaciers started melting 15,000 years ago.
Once upon a time you could walk from India to Australia, then the seas rose and flooded the land bridge.
CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere.
97% of CO2 in the atmosphere occurs naturally.
I'm keeping my old [looks new] Corolla.
The glaciers suddenly accelerated, melting as much as they did in thousands of years, in the space of a century. This is due to the rise from 280 ppm CO2 to 410 ppm in that short period, a change unprecedented in the planets history which has caused a rise in average global temperature that normally, in an interglacial period, would take thousands of years. The evidence is so glaring that you need welding goggles to look at it, you incredible fucking imbecile.
The increase in CO2 would actually be much higher, except that oceans absorb some of what we human make, and grow more acid. Which kills parts of them. You incredible fucking imbecile.
• The Earth is heated by the flux of energy it receives from the Sun, and cools down by emitting infrared radiation to space.
#####
Simple really, no degree from Harvard needed for this one either.
You’d have much more realistic view of the world if you pulled your head out of your ass.
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/11/25/headlines/coal_industry_knew_burning_fossil_fuels_causes_climate_change_as_early_as_1966?fbclid=IwAR2eDF-zHAtKv2UsB6QAKnzzNqXdBwj20bB0lMVzVdG-uC34yombrel3uS8
Kid and Bambu still don't accept man-made climate change. Ward still thinks it can be responded to by half-measures.
The globe heats, and cools, all by itself.
The glaciers started melting 15,000 years ago.
Once upon a time you could walk from India to Australia, then the seas rose and flooded the land bridge.
CO2 is 0.04% of the atmosphere.
97% of CO2 in the atmosphere occurs naturally.
I'm keeping my old [looks new] Corolla.
The glaciers suddenly accelerated, melting as much as they did in thousands of years, in the space of a century. This is due to the rise from 280 ppm CO2 to 410 ppm in that short period, a change unprecedented in the planets history which has caused a rise in average global temperature that normally, in an interglacial period, would take thousands of years. The evidence is so glaring that you need welding goggles to look at it, you incredible fucking imbecile.
The increase in CO2 would actually be much higher, except that oceans absorb some of what we human make, and grow more acid. Which kills parts of them. You incredible fucking imbecile.
https://www.democracynow.org/2019/11/25/headlines/coal_industry_knew_burning_fossil_fuels_causes_climate_change_as_early_as_1966?fbclid=IwAR2eDF-zHAtKv2UsB6QAKnzzNqXdBwj20bB0lMVzVdG-uC34yombrel3uS8
Kid and Bambu still don't accept man-made climate change. Ward still thinks it can be responded to by half-measures.
Boomer whiteys are especially problematic.
http://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmjpn4/millennials-have-a-right-to-be-pissed-at-boomers-this-data-proves-it
Millennials travel overseas every '5 minutes', have 50 pairs of shoes, live on takeaway food, get divorced, have the latest version of everything. Spend, spend, spend.
Boomers never went anywhere, saved hard to buy homes, drove old cars, stayed married forever, had old tvs if had tv at all, had old furniture...etc etc etc.
Millennials cheer for massive immigration, then complain they can't get well-paying jobs.
Dude. This is what YOU did.
I’m a boomer and I’m heading to Cancun week after next.
My 34 year old daughter bought a house last year...
You’re just a miserable mahfucka. No wonder Ms. Bambu travels the world without you. Probably came to the USA to get some wood.
Immigrants give them a acute feeling of insurmountable inferiority. Hard work, optimism, and a love of the adoptive country that all outstrip and outshine these crackers engenders self-hatred that these miserable shrunken people inevitably project on the immigrants who overshadow them and are the future of both England and the United States.
Whitey knows he can’t compete on any field.[/I]
Oh dear.
Poor Whitey.
I didn't realise it was like that...that Whitey had affirmative-actioned his children and himself out of all the good jobs, ...doctors, dentists, other professions, govt jobs etc.
Dumb Whitey, fell for the 'RIX' 3 card trick...'Racist', 'Intolerant', 'Xenophobic'.
Silly Whitey, too nice for his own good.
That is one way to excuse yourself for what you can no longer achieve. It’s utter bullshit, but in your degraded state bullshit like that might make you feel better.QuoteOh well, it's too late for Whitey now.
Only the for the ones too limited to leave their imagined whiteness behind, sad fools who think fascism is coming to save them; republicans in the USA and anyone who tunes into your #1 radio host.
Boomer whiteys are especially problematic.
http://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmjpn4/millennials-have-a-right-to-be-pissed-at-boomers-this-data-proves-it
