Now that I've read the article Kam pasted, I suppose I have the same response that there's nothing new here.
But it's true that having argument piled upon argument is persuasive.
I especially resonate with his comment about Randle playing a style "that doesn't fit with the pace & space of the modern game." Though that makes me think about Thib's capacity to run the offense any differently regardless.
In any case, is anyone aware of trades that the Knicks have turned down? Because they may have put themselves in a position where there's nothing else to do now but hope for the best.
That is, I hear the advantages to getting rid of Randall, and how terrible things will be with him, but I don't hear from the writer (perhaps I missed it) any practical suggestions how that would be done.