Escape from Elba

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  

News:

Poll

Who will win Game 5 of the NBA Finals?

Warriors
- 1 (33.3%)
Celtics
- 2 (66.7%)

Total Members Voted: 3

Voting closed: June 13, 2022, 11:38:11 PM


Pages: 1 ... 317 318 [319] 320 321 ... 1848

Author Topic: Knicks  (Read 916874 times)

Kam

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 4032
  • '77er
    • View Profile
#8 and #9 Picks of recent vintage
« Reply #4770 on: March 07, 2019, 10:29:16 PM »

2014 Nik Stauskas, Noah Vonleh
2015 Stan Johnson, Frank Kaminsky
2016 Marquese Chriss, Jakob Poetl
2017 Frank Ntilikina, Dennis Smith
2018 Collin Sexton, Kevin Knox



Logged
KP interns for the firm of Tatum and Brown

thebizneverloses

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
    • View Profile
Re: #8 and #9 Picks of recent vintage
« Reply #4771 on: March 08, 2019, 02:23:50 AM »

2014 Nik Stauskas, Noah Vonleh
2015 Stan Johnson, Frank Kaminsky
2016 Marquese Chriss, Jakob Poetl
2017 Frank Ntilikina, Dennis Smith
2018 Collin Sexton, Kevin Knox

Ha. We might have the best #8 pick in recent years. And while I think Poeltl might be the best #9 pick right now DSJ and Knox still have time to get there. Interesting catch, Kam.
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4772 on: March 08, 2019, 05:04:40 PM »

Fanboy alert

Heh
Logged

carlos123

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1744
  • so cute
    • View Profile
Say Whaaaaa...
« Reply #4773 on: March 08, 2019, 08:37:45 PM »

Logged
"I am your warrior and, if you feel you have been wronged or betrayed, I am your retribution, oh yes, your retribution."
- Putin's bitch at CPAC 2023

"Those Hispanics are funny, and they speak really funny"
- Bo Zizzley&Chip Stern

- Prayers for Chamaco Cartero -

- BAN THE AR15-
- Chamaco Cartero

bodiddley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6538
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4774 on: March 09, 2019, 05:23:36 AM »

I'd take Sexton and StanJohn over Franc.
Interesting how there is almost no difference between 8 & 9 and in fact 9 looks better almost every year.  None of those 10 has broken out yet, though Poetl looks solid and is closest to a legit starter.


For a few years folks were hand-wringing about the weak East and wanted to reformat the playoffs eliminating conferences.  And of course that overreaction has dried up as balance has returned.
Currently there are 7 East team above .500 and 3 losing teams battling for 8th.  But if you look out West there are 8 winning teams playoff bound and 9th place is currently .500. 
And if WASh had played to potential or Dragic had been hamstrung in MIA you'd likely have 8 winning East teams.  Anyway, tradition is good in some cases.  Short-term fixes aren't always good or necessary.  Even in some previous unbalanced years, you know that conference Top 8 = playoffs.  And the other conference standings don't matter to you.  Simple and effective.


Anyone notice the proliferation of ads on and around courtside?  Nearly all courts have the name of the stadium sponsor on the floor rather large, on each end.  The sidelines now frequently have a large company name in front of the benches (Draftkings for the Knix).  State Farm has been on the basket arm for a number of years now in most cities, but now there are often one or two other adverts crammed on the support arm as well.  The latest is under the seats of the bench there are adverts, mostly a big G for Gatorade, but one or two places have KIA.  Shows up between seated players legs.  A few teams have backrest covers on the bench chairs with ads too. 

The top edge of the backboard became common recently for teams to place their website address, as sky cameras became common.  But now perhaps half the team have ads on there.  Think about it, the top edge of the backboard has become its own ad space.  And there seems to be more ads throughout the arena that gets on to TV or into fans brains.  Have to say being bombarded with advertising isn't what I want when paying $50 and up or whatever to see an NBA game.
It's even starting to turn me off to watching on TV.
I'm actually usually excellent at tuning out ads and not noticing them, but the NBA courtside and TV experience is so crammed with ads its distracting and hard to miss.

And of course in the televised feed, every stat and replay seems to have its own sponsor and pays to get its name mentioned.  Unpleasant.    I guess the NBA is a hot commodity and is looking to squeeze out extra revenue while it can.  But it detracts from the experience.
Logged
Good Gov't Saves Lives
 --- Bad Gov't Kills ---

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4775 on: March 09, 2019, 02:11:59 PM »

Yeah.....Oubre a bit underwhelming for most of the Suns game....

Today - still puzzled by rotations - tough team to watch - but some of the talent makes it bearable.  Knicks hanging with Kings....
« Last Edit: March 09, 2019, 04:01:17 PM by kiidcarter8 »
Logged

Nagel

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4776 on: March 09, 2019, 02:44:56 PM »

knox looks like a bust at this point.  kid should have stayed in college.
Logged

bodiddley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6538
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4777 on: March 09, 2019, 03:55:13 PM »

Knox has shown promise.
Wasn't he East Rook of the Month in Dec?
Has a lot to learn.
On a good team he'd be playing maybe 15 mins a night off the bench.
He's not ready to start and play 30+ a night and go for 82 games.
So he's taking his lumps.
But it's experience and should pay off down the road.
In 3 years, he'll be just 22.
Patience.

Also who would you take instead?
It was a top-heavy draft and not deep.
The Bridges look allright, though not as NBA ready as advertised.
Shai is intriguing, but we likely weren't drafting a PG with the needs we had.  Porter was too risky while we were so bereft of talent.
Maybe if we drafted Kurucs, KZ woulda stayed ... ha & ha.

Just pretend we drafted Mitch #9 and Knox in the 2nd round and you'll be happier. 

Here's a Q from that draft:
Who is going to have a better career -- Luka or Trae?
« Last Edit: March 09, 2019, 04:03:15 PM by bodiddley »
Logged
Good Gov't Saves Lives
 --- Bad Gov't Kills ---

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4778 on: March 09, 2019, 04:05:54 PM »

It was either of Bridges boys, Knox or Porter, realistically.

My idea to deal down had some merit.

Deal up?  Heh - none of you wanted to consider moving KP - who is gone anyway.
Logged

bodiddley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6538
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4779 on: March 10, 2019, 09:03:57 AM »

It was either of Bridges boys, Knox or Porter, realistically.

And we weren't in position to draft a guy who would likely miss the entire year and whose injury/career prospects were uncertain.  So realistically you can scratch Porter too.

Knox or Bridges x 2.
We did fine.
Logged
Good Gov't Saves Lives
 --- Bad Gov't Kills ---

bodiddley

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6538
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4780 on: March 10, 2019, 09:13:27 AM »

Lakes pack in the season.
Ball won't play anymore this year.
Ingram too, has a blood clot on his arm.
Be interesting to see how much LeBJ plays.
Why wear him down and risk injury?
I'd pack him in for the rest of the season.
This will be the first Summer in almost a decade LBJ won't play a full month of playoff hoops.
Logged
Good Gov't Saves Lives
 --- Bad Gov't Kills ---

thebizneverloses

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 462
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4781 on: March 10, 2019, 11:59:59 AM »

Trae's good, maybe a future all-star. Luke looks like a lock to have multiple all-NBA seasons.

Shai is better than Knox or any of the Bridges. MP3, though, would be my pick, then Shai.

Bo, your sustained belief in Stanley Johnson is quite admirable. He looks terrible offensively time I see him. I think Frank has a way higher ceiling.
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4782 on: March 10, 2019, 02:11:49 PM »

It was either of Bridges boys, Knox or Porter, realistically.

And we weren't in position to draft a guy who would likely miss the entire year and whose injury/career prospects were uncertain.  So realistically you can scratch Porter too.

Knox or Bridges x 2.
We did fine.

Ignoring the trade down and really mistaken re:  Porter.

Heh
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4783 on: March 10, 2019, 02:33:51 PM »

Satoransky 50/44/80 over 23 games, all starts

Double digit assists in 8 of them (7.4 average)

11 wins, positive +/-
Logged

kiidcarter8

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 12267
    • View Profile
Re: Knicks
« Reply #4784 on: March 10, 2019, 06:27:32 PM »

Pistons stay hot behind Griffin, Ellington, Kennard and our old friend Langston Galloway
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 317 318 [319] 320 321 ... 1848