Now it might have been a sloppy error on your part.error
But you were and are way WAY too defensive about this.
...
So let it go, as I let it go over a year ago.
You have repeatedly insisted that you cannot read intent, Banks.
It's true - and yet, even as you
admit what you have been told is possible (
error), you immediately fall back onto mindreading.
"too defensive" --> you keep repeating the same accusation, without proof of intent. Porky keeps making the same attacks. What, then, constitutes "too defensive?" "Too aggressive" might be applied to the two of you, but I am certain you would take umbrage at it.
And no, you have not "let it go" any more than Ham has.
Letting it go would entail
either granting simply, "yeah, it could have been an error," without trying to reiterate that somehow Larry has screwed up,
or simply not responding any more to Larry's or Porky's comments on the topic.
(I agree, btw, that Larry could simply stop replying to your insistence that you can read his intent while granting that you cannot, and that would be letting it go. I think expecting him to stop replying to the racist pig is a bit much, if not as much as expecting said pig to stop - I am pretty sure that the Hamster cannot stop, without help.)