Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[LarryBnDC]

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Monday that a pair of allegations of inappropriate kissing and touching against former Vice President Joe Biden should “not at all” disqualify him from the 2020 race.

“No. No, I do not,” Pelosi told reporters when asked if she thinks the allegations from two women are disqualifying.

“I don’t think that this disqualifies him from being president,” she said while walking to the House chamber. “Not at all.”

The same Nancy Pelosi who took all of 2 seconds to throw Virginia Governor Ralph Northam under the bus for appearing in blackface when he was in college.

LOL

Are you a born asshole or were you just raised as such?

[josh]

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Monday that a pair of allegations of inappropriate kissing and touching against former Vice President Joe Biden should “not at all” disqualify him from the 2020 race.

“No. No, I do not,” Pelosi told reporters when asked if she thinks the allegations from two women are disqualifying.

“I don’t think that this disqualifies him from being president,” she said while walking to the House chamber. “Not at all.”

The same Nancy Pelosi who took all of 2 seconds to throw Virginia Governor Ralph Northam under the bus for appearing in blackface when he was in college.

LOL

LOL

This is the same poster who ignored his party's racist conduct and his party's kidnapping of children, keeping them from their parents.

LOL.

You were and are an amoral hypocrite who continues to refuse to engage in meaningful discussion.

[Yankguy1]

Red got a tax cut.

[josh]

More LOL-worthy material for Ward:

https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2019/04/supreme-court-neil-gorsuch-eighth-amendment-death-penalty-torture.html

Pay attention to this language: According to Gorsuch, “the question in dispute” here is whether lethal injection “cruelly superadds pain” to Bucklew’s death. But that language does not come from Baze or Glossip. It comes from Thomas’ separate opinions, which were joined only by Scalia. With one neat trick, Gorsuch has transformed the “superadds pain” test from a minority viewpoint to binding Supreme Court precedent.

Why does this matter? Because since 1958, the Supreme Court has rejected an originalist interpretation of the Eighth Amendment—which would, after all, permit the hanging of children, among other ghastly punishments. Instead, the court has asked whether a punishment violates the “evolving standards of decency” of a “civilized society.” Baze and Glossip did not embrace this standard, but they did not reject it, either. After all, by forcing states to use the less painful of two execution methods, the court adopted a resolutely nonoriginalist view that the Eighth Amendment may require a more “civilized” death. In Bucklew, Gorsuch gutted that logic and replaced it with Thomas’ hard-line originalism.

Ha. Ha. Ha.

[whiskeypriest]

Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said Monday that a pair of allegations of inappropriate kissing and touching against former Vice President Joe Biden should “not at all” disqualify him from the 2020 race.

“No. No, I do not,” Pelosi told reporters when asked if she thinks the allegations from two women are disqualifying.

“I don’t think that this disqualifies him from being president,” she said while walking to the House chamber. “Not at all.”

The same Nancy Pelosi who took all of 2 seconds to throw Virginia Governor Ralph Northam under the bus for appearing in blackface when he was in college.

LOL

Are you a born asshole or were you just raised as such?

Those are not mutually exclusive alternatives.

[josh]

https://twitter.com/Comey/status/1112798033320796160

I’m in. We need someone in the middle. #2020

[josh]

Kathy Kraninger is another of Trump's "best people."

She's in charge of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau - but she doesn't know what an APR is.

https://www.facebook.com/NowThisElection/videos/363576364366736/

[arafura]

Well thank God you can always post at "Stormfront" then.

Exactly why there are White Supremacists/White nationalists in America and elsewhere today...no one wants to condemn anti-White racism.

You have it totally backwards.

The White Supremacists have been with us for as long as there have been whites, Bambi.
Not a lot of lynching of whites going on in North America ever. Not a lot of negroes talking about the whites as a less er species that needed to be watched over because they could not function on their own. Nor claiming whites were happier being slaves.

And even now, it is still not happening.

Nah...I have it exactly the right way, forwards...today.
Today, some misguideds think anti-White racism is all just fine.
Andrew Bolt is trying to tell them it's not. He's trying to tell them that it could lead to another "White loser" snapping, and all that could entail.
It's also not what should be happening in today's "no hate speech" desired world.

No, you have it exactly wrong.

White supremacists have espoused the same bullshit for centuries. They have new excuses for the same lame lines - and you are one of their supporters.

Says you.
So, I take it then that you are, today, supporting hate speech and racism...as long as White people are the victims?

[josh]

Well thank God you can always post at "Stormfront" then.

Exactly why there are White Supremacists/White nationalists in America and elsewhere today...no one wants to condemn anti-White racism.

You have it totally backwards.

The White Supremacists have been with us for as long as there have been whites, Bambi.
Not a lot of lynching of whites going on in North America ever. Not a lot of negroes talking about the whites as a less er species that needed to be watched over because they could not function on their own. Nor claiming whites were happier being slaves.

And even now, it is still not happening.

Nah...I have it exactly the right way, forwards...today.
Today, some misguideds think anti-White racism is all just fine.
Andrew Bolt is trying to tell them it's not. He's trying to tell them that it could lead to another "White loser" snapping, and all that could entail.
It's also not what should be happening in today's "no hate speech" desired world.

No, you have it exactly wrong.

White supremacists have espoused the same bullshit for centuries. They have new excuses for the same lame lines - and you are one of their supporters.

Says you.

Such a brilliant rebuttal.

Which part of it are you disputing, Bambi?

[josh]

I'll be so relieved when April Fool's Day is over so we can stop tricking each other for fun and just go back to doing it for sex or financial gain.

- Jess Morphine

Or power.
- Josh

[josh]

- Escher's Brexit

[josh]

[arafura]

Well thank God you can always post at "Stormfront" then.

Exactly why there are White Supremacists/White nationalists in America and elsewhere today...no one wants to condemn anti-White racism.

You have it totally backwards.

The White Supremacists have been with us for as long as there have been whites, Bambi.
Not a lot of lynching of whites going on in North America ever. Not a lot of negroes talking about the whites as a less er species that needed to be watched over because they could not function on their own. Nor claiming whites were happier being slaves.

And even now, it is still not happening.

Nah...I have it exactly the right way, forwards...today.
Today, some misguideds think anti-White racism is all just fine.
Andrew Bolt is trying to tell them it's not. He's trying to tell them that it could lead to another "White loser" snapping, and all that could entail.
It's also not what should be happening in today's "no hate speech" desired world.

No, you have it exactly wrong.

White supremacists have espoused the same bullshit for centuries. They have new excuses for the same lame lines - and you are one of their supporters.

Says you.

Such a brilliant rebuttal.

Which part of it are you disputing, Bambi?

I know what's happened for centuries and in modern times.

Disputing that you didn't answer the question; "So, I take it then that you are, today, supporting hate speech and racism...as long as White people are the victims?"
Simple yes or no answer. In the absence of a 'no' answer, or in the absence of any answer, then it's reasonable to assume it is otherwise.

[facilitatorn]

Josh supports accurate speech about people who pursue hateful behavior.

A lot of you happen to be white.

Get better, Bambi. You are running out of time.

[facilitatorn]

http://www.vice.com/en_us/article/zmaagy/is-the-gop-healthcare-plan-actually-an-april-fools-prank

The pivot to healthcare and threat to cause further chaos at the border both point to Individual 1 knowing there is no good news and hundreds of pages of very very bad news for the failing presidency in the Mueller report.

Barr has already told trump he should be getting ready to pardon himself.