2701
Previous Administration / Re: Trump Administration
« on: January 20, 2021, 11:59:52 AM »
Josh, time to remove "Trump administration" as the main political thread?
Get guns off the streets. Get them out of the hands of criminals, lunatics, right wing extremists, and other Rambo fantasy incels in Kid’s peer group.
Control of both houses of Congress is absolute political control.
Try to be a little less critical....
No need to respond. My point was clear. He is free to misread it and rant incoherently.
https://www.nbcnewyork.com/news/coronavirus/smokers-in-nj-will-get-access-to-covid-vaccine-before-general-public/2830615/
If you teach in New Jersey, you have to wait to get your vaccine behind....wait for it....
people who smoke!
The medical profession can't be in the business of making moral judgments on patients. If I'm in the ER with my hand bleeding and there's a guy with COPD who can't breathe, they're taking him first regardless of his smoking history.
I would like my schoolteacher daughter to be early in line, though, because that protects potentially hundreds of people.
Isn't giving a vaccine a moral judgement? And these smokers put themselves at risk by choices they made to meet the needs of themselves only. Your daughter put herself at risk by choices she made to meet the needs of others.
Isn't the phrase, "first do no harm" calling for making a moral judgement?
Not exactly. Medicine has a moral basis. But making personal judgments about patients sinfulness is not part of that, as you must surely be aware. Doctors don't backburner diabetic patients because they always ate too many cookies when they could have had an apple. They do triage on the basis of what patients, in this moment, are most in need, a practical and humane standard that is centuries old and not controversial. My daughter kayaks, and has dad's robust immune system, so her risk is much lower than a COPD sufferer. If all other factors were discounted, the COPD person would go first. ( The question of moving her up the line was a practical one of the impact on public health and older relatives of pupils. One could ask the same question regarding supermarket cashiers, et al)
Public health measures, like vaccines, tend to rely on utilitarian ethics rather than individual virtue, isn't that the case? IOW, what will help the most people as soon as possible and save the most lives? That's more judgment-neutral (judgment used here in the personal sense of judging a particular person).
All i know is that the excessively overweight, smoking, did-it-too-him/herself self-indulgent couch potato goes ahead instead of the person who acts responsibly and acts for others.
If you're okay with that, then that tells us something.
Reviewing the events of the past year alone can anyone speculate as to what depths Trump and his supporters wouldn't descend?