A critique of Pendejo Trades?
Your wish is my command, Don Carlos.
So...BO...it's not a hard on for Julius Randle.
Rather, THAT HE REPRESENTS A REDUNDANCY.
Ahhhh, so....
And thus, in acquiring a player who will turn THIRTY-FIVE [35] in May, is owed a cap space friendly $38, $41, $44 million through 2022, and who played a total of 61, 58 and 58 games over the prior three season, we would be stabilizing our roster. And give away arguably the best player on our team, arguably entering this primacy, with another 5-7 years of productive ball ahead.
The last time the Knicks engaged in such a clever bit of roster balancing was 30 years ago, when the BoD of our front office, Al Bianchi, in another memorable path towards stabilizing our roster and removing redundancies (huh?), traded 23 year old Rod Strickland for 33 year old Mo Cheeks. We got a season and change out of Mo's Earthly Remains, while Hot Rod went on to have a solid 10 years as a front line player, and another five as a capable roll player. (Rod also had a number of season where injuries too their toll.)
Only chin music, after all, a dull day between games, but, I am unmoved by the "logic" of putting all of our eggs in such a cap-consuming, oft-injured, geriatric basket, my love for CP3 notwithstanding.
With all due respect to Doc Diddley, maybe if we had off-loaded all of the assets we did for Carmelo for PAUL, back in the day, the positive influence of which you speak would have been a reality.
Now it is the ghost dance of a dying tribe on the Great Plains.
And so, presently, in the fear and sow, let me catch my breath and exhale in anticipation of tonight's savage beat down at the hands of the Bucks.