So we should have been a playoff team last year?
Tanking caused KZ to demand a trade?
And somehow Zion or Morant would materialize on the Knix?
Does anyone think any of that accords with any kind of reality??
Otherwise, I am not a Fizz fan.
I was probably Fizz's biggest detractor when we hired him, calling him a chronic BS-er. And he still somewhat rubs me the wrong way. Most here seemed to like him when he was hired.
I just don't like constantly churning over the roster and the coach. Continuity would help the Knicks a good deal.
Last year, I thought Fizz got many reclamation and rooks to play above expectations -- Mud, Mitch, Trier, Knox(?), Vonleh, Burke, Dot -- gave everyone a chance to shine, and succeeded in tanking and getting us RJB. Positives. To me, 17 W's was better than 27 or 37. Nabbed us RJB
This year, I don't like the way Fizz is using Franc (too little) or RJB (too much). I blame the front office for giving Fizz another mismatched roster, albeit one with more talent than last year's.
Still hardly anyone expected these Knix to win 30 games.
So I want to develop players, figure out who stays, get some chemistry between the long-term components, and don't care about winning 20 or 30 games
Regardless, I'd want our coach, any coach, to get at least 2 full years to do his thing. If Fizz is a good development and tanking coach, then he'll have improved our yute and added two blue chip Top 5 draftees. And his time here wouldn't have been a waste.