You took one blurb from 10/30 and ran with it - idiotic take about LaMelo falling for interview reason.
Be better.
Responding to what isn't incoherent in your post:
I spotted a Yahoo article saying Ball was awful in interviews.
Which linked to the main report saying teams were turned off by Ball interviews.
Then I googled "LaMelo Ball interview" and spotted a number of articles about his poor answering. (Dismissing an article which said he could drop due to that and also speculating it could be NYK trying to spread rumors and getting him to drop).
But instead of linking to one of the many 'Ball is crappy at interviewing' articles, I posted a very neutral youtube vid of Ball himself non-answering Q's for 20 mins.
So instead of your characterization of me allegedly mischaracterizing one "blurb", I actually researched it, skimmed through a few articles, gave a succinct summary and provided Ball himself interviewing. I don't think I could have been more thorough or objective.
But continue to be wrong and not know what you're talking about.