I posted a quote from his daughter.
Speaking of context, your original problem was I stated White America hated King until after he was dead and you disputed that with your usual vehemence.
Now you’re saying King was persona non grata... no shit.
My original problem was your misleading bullshit. And I called you on it.
Larry you've used that 75% several times over the years to portray the white hatred of MLK, but you always ignored the fact that in '67, a year of riots and civil unrest of all sorts, about 60% of black America had a big problem with MLK too.
But you never mention that.
Nor that in 1964 (pre-riots, pre-Civil Rights and Voting Rights Act) the year that MLK won the Nobel Peace Prize, half of America admired him. And in the 1964-67, with the social changes, riots, and the war in Viet Nam, his approval fell from 50% to 25%.
And Larry the reason there is, as you say, "no shit" is because you are full of it.
Your original problem was your assertion I was wrong about white America’s attitude and that you and your family loved King.
My point remains, King was not the dew eyed dreamer he’s been whitewashed into.
Do you ever wonder why you spend so much time “calling” me on things?
Yeah.
I don't have a problem Larry.
You do.
With facts and context.
Facts and context about 1964-67, which specifically related to MLK, that you did not and can not refute.
And Larry I spend far less time calling you out than I do with Red or kid or Utley.
When I disagree with someone on a forum, I disagree with them.
If you have a problem with that, that's your problem.
Heat-kitchen