Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Very

6 (50%)

Some

4 (33.3%)

Not sure

0 (0%)

Not really

1 (8.3%)

Not in the slightest

1 (8.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM

[FlyingVProd]

We need to welcome our senior citizens to live at the fun exciting apartment complexes with the young people, and they can have parties with live bands, etc.

https://youtu.be/x4K7dnixw5I

The old people who helped to build our cities must not be excluded from our societies.

We can have tacos, and pizza, and live bands, and the children can dance with their grandparents.

Salute,

Tony V.

[josh]

G.O.P. Declares Jan. 6 Attack 'Legitimate Political Discourse'

NYT reporting, but really just GOP being nuts.

https://www.cnn.com/2022/02/04/politics/liz-cheney-adam-kinzinger-censure-rnc/index.html

[LarryBnDC]

LEGITIMATE POLITICAL DISCOURSE


https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2020/02/03/were-living-in-the-republican-partys-altered-states/

[FlyingVProd]

Former Miss USA Cheslie Kryst committed suicide, and it never should have happened, she should have had a whole community to support her.

In the OC go to the Wellness Center in Orange, or go to the Mental Health Association in Santa Ana. People will help you.

And in the apartment complexes a lot of people make friends with their neighbors and they have a support system with their neighbors.

Salute,

Tony V.

[josh]

I posted a far longer piece about this over in Education.

[josh]

https://www.npr.org/2022/02/02/1077056059/new-mexico-national-guard-substitute-teachers

[josh]

[bodiddley]

Of course Supreme Court judges were selected based on race and gender for the first 200 years the country existed. The positions being restricted to white males only, from Washington to Carter. Only a very small percentage of Supreme Court justices, if any, were selected without prioritizing race or gender.

[REDSTATEWARD]

Of course Supreme Court judges were selected based on race and gender for the first 200 years the country existed. The positions being restricted to white males only, from Washington to Carter. Only a very small percentage of Supreme Court justices, if any, were selected without prioritizing race or gender.

Diddley must have studied American history under Chuck Schumer.

[facilitatorn]

Of course Supreme Court judges were selected based on race and gender for the first 200 years the country existed. The positions being restricted to white males only, from Washington to Carter. Only a very small percentage of Supreme Court justices, if any, were selected without prioritizing race or gender.

Diddley must have studied American history under Chuck Schumer.

He must have missed your Joe Goebbels version, with the constantly twisted facts, as popularized by neo-Nazi lost cause republicans.

It probably has something to do with why he has not buried his head up his ass like you have done with yours.

[bodiddley]

I always like such dismissive evasions.

Indisputable that from 1789 to 1980 only white males were considered for SCOTUS.

Then in 1980 Reagan promised to pick a (white) female, and did in 1981.
Then back to the GOP picking white males only, until Thurgood Marhshall died, and another black male was purposely chosen.   So from 1789 to 1991, all nominees were selected on the basis of race and gender.

Since then the GOP mostly selects white males and the DEMs females of various ethnicity.

[facilitatorn]

I read republicans are transitioning from deplorable to depraved. It appears Red is getting swept up in the implications of his new gender identity. His first problem is that he does not have a safe place to go to the bathroom where he is not in danger of being molested by himself.

[REDSTATEWARD]

I always like such dismissive evasions.

Indisputable that from 1789 to 1980 only white males were considered for SCOTUS.

LOL!

[Hamilton Samuels]

LEGITIMATE POLITICAL DISCOURSE


https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2020/02/03/were-living-in-the-republican-partys-altered-states/

Zealotry disguised as "journalism".

Your politics is your religion.

That said, your self promotion does not belong in this forum, Larry.

Your "news" is bunk.

[josh]

LEGITIMATE POLITICAL DISCOURSE


https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2020/02/03/were-living-in-the-republican-partys-altered-states/

Zealotry disguised as "journalism".

Your politics is your religion.

That said, your self promotion does not belong in this forum, Larry.

Your "news" is bunk.

Did you read it, Ham?

If so, what specifically are you claiming is bunk?

Did you know all of it already? Do you think everybody here knew it?

You claim that it's zealotry - what makes what Larry wrote zealous or untrue?