Kamala Harris got zero delegates in her disastrous campaign and today has the best chance of anyone to become our next President.
Dismiss Kennedy all you want but he consistently polls about 20% in primary sampling so it is no surprise that the usual cast of leftist media sniping from the Washington Post, the NewYork Times, The Guardian, Time, etc continues unabated.
Heh. Zero delegates. Now go change your underwear, that wet stain is embarrassing.
Harris got as many delegates as Pence got in 2016. Or Ryan in 2012. Or Biden or Palin did in 2008. Or Chaney in 2000. You should think about the comparisons you make.
I did.
This, I assume, was intended to go after my first paragraph.
You decided to pivot to irrelevancy.
No, the irrelevancy was your bringing up Harris's primary results with regard to her selection as VP on the Biden ticket. How well a person did in the primaries has not been a factor in the selection of a VP candidate since, what, Lyndon Johnson? I guess Edwards and Bush I as an exception, but that is 62 years with two times where the VP candidate was even partly based on primary performance. Making your likening of RFK Jr to Harris stupid and inappropriate, even for you.
As I warned, dismiss Kennedy at your peril but his candidacy is bothersome to his party given the Biden age factor and his unpopularity.
20% gets him 0 delegate votes. And he will not top 10% in the Democratic process. Biden is not that unpopular among Dems and those concerned about his age ain't going for him.