Total Members Voted: 11
Voting closed: February 15, 2022, 10:51:36 AM
Quote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 06:46:06 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 03:27:07 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 02:56:09 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 02:23:49 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 01:25:49 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 01:02:03 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.I have no knowledge to add to the debate of the origins of Covid.You could have stopped after the ninth word. Or sixth. Or for that matter, fourth.QuoteRatcliffe is testifying under oath today in Congress about what he knows.I do not doubt the importance of determining the cause of COVID. Just the relevance of one opinion based on "Unassailable" undisclosed sources. Especially when the opinion uses a phrase like "only explanation and plausible assessment."One opinion?That is what you provided in the post I responded to, yes.Man. You must not read or watch newsWeeks ago I posted the FBI and Department of Energy findings.The House Oversight Committee Hearing was only a week ago.And yesterday you posted some lame jackass who purported to know the "only explanation and plausible assessment" based on "unassailable" sources. Which is what I responded to.Some lame jackass? Who was that?
Quote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 03:27:07 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 02:56:09 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 02:23:49 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 01:25:49 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 01:02:03 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.I have no knowledge to add to the debate of the origins of Covid.You could have stopped after the ninth word. Or sixth. Or for that matter, fourth.QuoteRatcliffe is testifying under oath today in Congress about what he knows.I do not doubt the importance of determining the cause of COVID. Just the relevance of one opinion based on "Unassailable" undisclosed sources. Especially when the opinion uses a phrase like "only explanation and plausible assessment."One opinion?That is what you provided in the post I responded to, yes.Man. You must not read or watch newsWeeks ago I posted the FBI and Department of Energy findings.The House Oversight Committee Hearing was only a week ago.And yesterday you posted some lame jackass who purported to know the "only explanation and plausible assessment" based on "unassailable" sources. Which is what I responded to.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 02:56:09 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 02:23:49 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 01:25:49 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 01:02:03 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.I have no knowledge to add to the debate of the origins of Covid.You could have stopped after the ninth word. Or sixth. Or for that matter, fourth.QuoteRatcliffe is testifying under oath today in Congress about what he knows.I do not doubt the importance of determining the cause of COVID. Just the relevance of one opinion based on "Unassailable" undisclosed sources. Especially when the opinion uses a phrase like "only explanation and plausible assessment."One opinion?That is what you provided in the post I responded to, yes.Man. You must not read or watch newsWeeks ago I posted the FBI and Department of Energy findings.The House Oversight Committee Hearing was only a week ago.
Quote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 02:23:49 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 01:25:49 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 01:02:03 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.I have no knowledge to add to the debate of the origins of Covid.You could have stopped after the ninth word. Or sixth. Or for that matter, fourth.QuoteRatcliffe is testifying under oath today in Congress about what he knows.I do not doubt the importance of determining the cause of COVID. Just the relevance of one opinion based on "Unassailable" undisclosed sources. Especially when the opinion uses a phrase like "only explanation and plausible assessment."One opinion?That is what you provided in the post I responded to, yes.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on April 18, 2023, 01:25:49 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 01:02:03 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.I have no knowledge to add to the debate of the origins of Covid.You could have stopped after the ninth word. Or sixth. Or for that matter, fourth.QuoteRatcliffe is testifying under oath today in Congress about what he knows.I do not doubt the importance of determining the cause of COVID. Just the relevance of one opinion based on "Unassailable" undisclosed sources. Especially when the opinion uses a phrase like "only explanation and plausible assessment."One opinion?
Quote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 01:02:03 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.I have no knowledge to add to the debate of the origins of Covid.You could have stopped after the ninth word. Or sixth. Or for that matter, fourth.QuoteRatcliffe is testifying under oath today in Congress about what he knows.I do not doubt the importance of determining the cause of COVID. Just the relevance of one opinion based on "Unassailable" undisclosed sources. Especially when the opinion uses a phrase like "only explanation and plausible assessment."
Quote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:49:29 PMQuote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.I have no knowledge to add to the debate of the origins of Covid.
Quote from: Espnthree on April 18, 2023, 12:35:39 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.. Oh. So you're fine with him having the "final say". Make up your mind.
Quote from: Yankguy1 on April 18, 2023, 12:19:38 PMHe seems to think so.What is wrong with that?He led the Intelligence Agency so he certainly is privy to a lot of information.And most of the more recent opinions tend to support similar conclusions that were repressed by Big Tech during the Covid years.
He seems to think so.
Ratcliffe is testifying under oath today in Congress about what he knows.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on April 19, 2023, 09:04:20 AMQuote from: bambu. on April 19, 2023, 07:44:43 AMJoe stuffed up the withdrawal from Afghanistan.Trump had it all sorted, told the Taliban boss that if he did anything to wreck the smooth withdrawal that Trump would make him, and the Taliban pay, bigtime...Trump showed him a photo of his house..."we know where you live".No he did not you Trump loving fascist turd. He gave the Taliban a date by which we would be out, and they agreed not to take military action until then. One of the few good things he did. We kept up our end of the agreement. The Taliban kept its word. The did nothing to wreck the withdrawal. It was done before they moved.What the Biden people, the intelligence community, the military and, when they were there, the Trump people got wrong is they overestimated the quality of the Afghan military and underestimated how fast the Taliban take over would be. There was no plan in place to deal with the collapse. That is on Biden and the military. But unless you are going to argue that the intelligence estimate of the Taliban advance would have been different under Trump, the same shit would happen. And there would be no way to stop them. There were 2000 combat troops left.when Trump was dragged from the White House kicking and screaming like a spoiled child who cannot.accept that the circus has ended, and no substantial forces by the date the Taliban started their advance. He could not "make them pay, bigly or otherwise. It would have been logistically impossible.Saw Trump interviewed, he said he told the Taliban he would basically bomb them into ash if they didn't do what he wanted.
Quote from: bambu. on April 19, 2023, 07:44:43 AMJoe stuffed up the withdrawal from Afghanistan.Trump had it all sorted, told the Taliban boss that if he did anything to wreck the smooth withdrawal that Trump would make him, and the Taliban pay, bigtime...Trump showed him a photo of his house..."we know where you live".No he did not you Trump loving fascist turd. He gave the Taliban a date by which we would be out, and they agreed not to take military action until then. One of the few good things he did. We kept up our end of the agreement. The Taliban kept its word. The did nothing to wreck the withdrawal. It was done before they moved.What the Biden people, the intelligence community, the military and, when they were there, the Trump people got wrong is they overestimated the quality of the Afghan military and underestimated how fast the Taliban take over would be. There was no plan in place to deal with the collapse. That is on Biden and the military. But unless you are going to argue that the intelligence estimate of the Taliban advance would have been different under Trump, the same shit would happen. And there would be no way to stop them. There were 2000 combat troops left.when Trump was dragged from the White House kicking and screaming like a spoiled child who cannot.accept that the circus has ended, and no substantial forces by the date the Taliban started their advance. He could not "make them pay, bigly or otherwise. It would have been logistically impossible.
Joe stuffed up the withdrawal from Afghanistan.Trump had it all sorted, told the Taliban boss that if he did anything to wreck the smooth withdrawal that Trump would make him, and the Taliban pay, bigtime...Trump showed him a photo of his house..."we know where you live".
http://m.dailykos.com/stories/2023/4/19/2164751/-Republican-Party-in-drunken-disarray-as-video-of-Michigan-infighting-goes-viralEvery day the republicans become more and more themselves.
And you believed him? That is on you. Donald Trump lies about everything, everywhere, all at once. Especially when it makes him and his Vienna sausage fingers look strong, or tough, or powerful.
Amazing how hate and fear seek cover.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on April 20, 2023, 01:01:34 PMAmazing how hate and fear seek cover.LOL!democrats own the message of hate by referring to anyone who disagrees with them RACISTS or HOMOPHOBES, etc.
Poll
