Cutbacks in the USPS are long overdue. It is setup to be revenue neutral and subsist on revenues generated.
It is at least $80 billion in the red which means our tax money needs to bail it out.
Yes, it is set up to be revenue neutral and to subsist on revenues generated.
I question that choice.
why would you question it?
Why wouldn't you? Why should it be?!
What other governmental agencies are "revenue neutral," in and of themselves?
THe USPS is an independent service and not supported by tax revenue, like Defense, Education, Labor Departments .
Only since 1970 has it been "independent," but it is still a part of the Executive Branch. It continued to receive budgetary support, with bits and pieces of that getting dropped over the last 38 years or so.
I asked, "What other governmental agencies are "revenue neutral," in and of themselves?"
I can think of about 30 other independent agencies. Only one of them is supposed to provide its own budget - Social Security.
I reiterate: "What other governmental agencies are "revenue neutral," in and of themselves?"
And, further, why should the USPS be one of them?! The changes that made that so are legislative. What reasons are there for not changing it back?
Changing it back to what?
If you want to make it for-profit remember it is charged with delivering first class mail every where in the USA even if it takes teams of mules to reach destinations in rural Montana. In return it was granted a monopoly on first and third rate mail and ownership of all postal mailboxes in the Country. SCOTUS has ruled that the USPS , as an independent government agency, is immune from antitrust actions.
Given that it
has never been for-profit, it would be hard to change it "back" to that, wouldn't you think?!
Changing it back from being an "independent" agency, Ward. Returning it to being an Executive Branch department at the Cabinet level.
And I am still waiting for your oh so cogent analysis of:"
What other governmental agencies are "revenue neutral," in and of themselves?"
As well as
Why should it be?!But at this point, your refusal to even attempt the red question says you know of none. And you have no good answer to the 2nd question, either.