[
Your snide comment to Josh was false.
You told Josh: "That’s a chapter of the story you neglected."
My later post pointed out that the dismal effects of Hayes-Tilden - which no one here disputes at all - were discussed in the article Josh posted. Therefore, he did not neglect that story, and in fact was the one who posted it. Your rhetorical stab at him, that he was neglecting the results of that infamous horsetrading, was false.
Either you lied, or you didn't bother to read past the first couple paragraphs of the NYer piece.
The cited Article only touched on the real tragedy of the Hayes/Tilden Compromise without detailing what ensued. 85 years of Southern democrats disenfranchising black voters.
No one who read the article was presented those facts in any sort of detail.
Your point about southern democrats disenfranchising black voters isn't a mark against modern democrats.
We've discussed the change in the constituency of the Rep and Dem parties.
The southern democrats of that time are the southern republicans of today.
Southern whites switched from Dem to Rep roughly 50 years ago and blacks switched from Rep to Dem around the same time.