Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[josh]

Poor Joe.
Two more women come forward.
Oh! The humanity!
Anita Hill must be avenged!

Poor Ward.

Cannot come to grips with the racist, rapacious GOP to which he swears his allegiance.

[REDSTATEWARD]

Democratic deficits: Socialist cocksuckers.

Republican deficits: Who cares? I got my tax cut.

LOL
Those are yours.  Not mine.

LOL

You are an amoral hypocrite.

Not in any way.

[facilitatorn]

Red is consistent.

He’s in favor, be it bush or trump, if anyone with a solid plan to bring the US auto industry to its knees.

Also, being a tax cheat, a la Redward, is different than getting a tax cut.

[facilitatorn]

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2019/apr/02/mar-a-lago-woman-malware-chinese-passports

Mar a Lago technically is a fucking swamp.

[arafura]

Well thank God you can always post at "Stormfront" then.

Exactly why there are White Supremacists/White nationalists in America and elsewhere today...no one wants to condemn anti-White racism.

You have it totally backwards.

The White Supremacists have been with us for as long as there have been whites, Bambi.
Not a lot of lynching of whites going on in North America ever. Not a lot of negroes talking about the whites as a less er species that needed to be watched over because they could not function on their own. Nor claiming whites were happier being slaves.

And even now, it is still not happening.

Nah...I have it exactly the right way, forwards...today.
Today, some misguideds think anti-White racism is all just fine.
Andrew Bolt is trying to tell them it's not. He's trying to tell them that it could lead to another "White loser" snapping, and all that could entail.
It's also not what should be happening in today's "no hate speech" desired world.

No, you have it exactly wrong.

White supremacists have espoused the same bullshit for centuries. They have new excuses for the same lame lines - and you are one of their supporters.

Says you.

Such a brilliant rebuttal.

Which part of it are you disputing, Bambi?

I know what's happened for centuries and in modern times.

Disputing that you didn't answer the question; "So, I take it then that you are, today, supporting hate speech and racism...as long as White people are the victims?"
Simple yes or no answer. In the absence of a 'no' answer, or in the absence of any answer, then it's reasonable to assume it is otherwise.

I already answered the question, asshole.

And you said "says you," which suggests you disputed part of what I wrote before your bogus "question."

Which part of "White supremacists have espoused the same bullshit for centuries. They have new excuses for the same lame lines - and you are one of their supporters." are you disputing, Bambi?

You didn't answer the question...so it's reasonable to assume the answer is something other than 'no'.

[josh]

Democratic deficits: Socialist cocksuckers.

Republican deficits: Who cares? I got my tax cut.

LOL
Those are yours.  Not mine.

LOL

You are an amoral hypocrite.

Not in any way.

On racism.

On the deficit.

On life.

On rule of law.

At a minimum.

You are an amoral hypocrite.

[REDSTATEWARD]

Democratic deficits: Socialist cocksuckers.

Republican deficits: Who cares? I got my tax cut.

LOL
Those are yours.  Not mine.

LOL

You are an amoral hypocrite.

Not in any way.

On racism.

On the deficit.

On life.

On rule of law.

At a minimum.

You are an amoral hypocrite.

LOL

[josh]

Well thank God you can always post at "Stormfront" then.

Exactly why there are White Supremacists/White nationalists in America and elsewhere today...no one wants to condemn anti-White racism.

You have it totally backwards.

The White Supremacists have been with us for as long as there have been whites, Bambi.
Not a lot of lynching of whites going on in North America ever. Not a lot of negroes talking about the whites as a less er species that needed to be watched over because they could not function on their own. Nor claiming whites were happier being slaves.

And even now, it is still not happening.

Nah...I have it exactly the right way, forwards...today.
Today, some misguideds think anti-White racism is all just fine.
Andrew Bolt is trying to tell them it's not. He's trying to tell them that it could lead to another "White loser" snapping, and all that could entail.
It's also not what should be happening in today's "no hate speech" desired world.

No, you have it exactly wrong.

White supremacists have espoused the same bullshit for centuries. They have new excuses for the same lame lines - and you are one of their supporters.

Says you.

Such a brilliant rebuttal.

Which part of it are you disputing, Bambi?

I know what's happened for centuries and in modern times.

Disputing that you didn't answer the question; "So, I take it then that you are, today, supporting hate speech and racism...as long as White people are the victims?"
Simple yes or no answer. In the absence of a 'no' answer, or in the absence of any answer, then it's reasonable to assume it is otherwise.

I already answered the question, asshole.

And you said "says you," which suggests you disputed part of what I wrote before your bogus "question."

Which part of "White supremacists have espoused the same bullshit for centuries. They have new excuses for the same lame lines - and you are one of their supporters." are you disputing, Bambi?

You didn't answer the question...so it's reasonable to assume the answer is something other than 'no'.

Like I said, I answered it before you asked. You even responded to my answer.

But here, again, is your question:

"So, I take it then that you are, today, supporting hate speech and racism...as long as White people are the victims?"

Using your awesome powers of computer foo, go to Reply #12041.

And it turns out you don't dispute any of my claims. You just say "says you" in a knee jerk response. Emphasis on jerk.

Cool.

[josh]

Democratic deficits: Socialist cocksuckers.

Republican deficits: Who cares? I got my tax cut.

LOL
Those are yours.  Not mine.

LOL

You are an amoral hypocrite.

Not in any way.

On racism.

On the deficit.

On life.

On rule of law.

At a minimum.

You are an amoral hypocrite.

LOL

LOL!

Everything's a joke to you, Ward. I get it.

Children torn illegally from their parents and prevented from returning to them? LOL!

North Carolina GOP racists try to gerrymander to block Blacks from having a voice? LOL!

The deficit climbs sharply, despite promises by President Trump to reduce it? LOL!

Mick Mulvaney admits that his posturing about the deficit was just that, in an effort to get tax cuts for the rich? LOL!

Amoral hypocrite fits you like a glove.

But you just lie, deny, and obfuscate - and now, LOL!.

ZeroIntegrityWard.

[josh]

Here's another big laugher, ZeroIntegrityWard:

https://www.theweathernetwork.com/ca/news/article/how-humans-derailed-the-earths-climate-in-just-160-years

You and your buddy, Bambi, can laugh about it all night long.

[josh]

[facilitatorn]

Red is contemplating his oranges.

Golf cheat is getting mighty creaky. One good hard year and he won’t be able to make it out in public anymore.

In interviews he’s looking more and more like a raccoon you catch with a flashlight in your garbage can.

The clearance “fixer” is coming to Congress for his well deserved reaming. The whistle has launched 25 discreet investigations so far. I can only think of ten obvious clearance fails outside of immediate family. It was specific to WH staff. The fact that possibly only one cabinet head of the whole  lot is clean enough to clear is an entirely different story.

[josh]

[kiidcarter8]

Yawwwwnn.....

[kiidcarter8]

On Jared, Trump and legal immigration:

https://www.politico.com/story/2019/04/03/jared-kushner-expand-legal-immigration-1249950