Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[LarryBnDC]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

They love throwing that elections have consequences around because, Obama.

Stop stealing elections. When your electoral strategy depends on fewer people voting it means you know your policies suck for most.

[josh]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Even if the election was rigged by the Russians with Trump's involvement?

That is, if that were proven, would you still support "elections have consequences" as your line?

[josh]

I dont think the new court will change much

Even the Roe vs Waders are in error.  I dont see that overturned with Kavanaugh in.

National security interests are more important to me.  The new justice could help out in that area.

Why don't you see that overturned with Kavanaugh in, given his past related votes?

And... if national security interests are more important to you, then why in the name of Cthulu do you support this administration?

Security theater =/= national security.

[REDSTATEWARD]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Even if the election was rigged by the Russians with Trump's involvement?

That is, if that were proven, would you still support "elections have consequences" as your line?

We already know that to be false.

[REDSTATEWARD]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

They love throwing that elections have consequences around because, Obama.

Stop stealing elections. When your electoral strategy depends on fewer people voting it means you know your policies suck for most.

We had more voters in 2016 than 2012.

[LarryBnDC]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

They love throwing that elections have consequences around because, Obama.

Stop stealing elections. When your electoral strategy depends on fewer people voting it means you know your policies suck for most.

We had more voters in 2016 than 2012.

What you mean We, white man?

[LarryBnDC]

Senator Harris knows the answer to the question Kavanaugh doesn’t want to answer but knows damn well he’d better not lie.





https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tsm1GPnlqmU

[josh]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Even if the election was rigged by the Russians with Trump's involvement?

That is, if that were proven, would you still support "elections have consequences" as your line?

We already know that to be false.

I know you have multiple personalities, Red, but even when all of you agree on something it is still only one.

And no, "we" know no such thing. I would tell you to provide some evidence, but you don't do that.

[josh]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

They love throwing that elections have consequences around because, Obama.

Stop stealing elections. When your electoral strategy depends on fewer people voting it means you know your policies suck for most.

We had more voters in 2016 than 2012.

So did we.

So what?

It doesn't mean that the GOP has not been actively seeking to, and sometimes succeeding at, getting people to not vote who they believe would vote for their opponents.

Your disingenous attempts to deflect the conversation have no bearing on reality.

[LarryBnDC]

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

Not celebrating anything

Just saying we get our 4 years

Elections have consequences. Dont get mad - get better

They love throwing that elections have consequences around because, Obama.

Stop stealing elections. When your electoral strategy depends on fewer people voting it means you know your policies suck for most.

We had more voters in 2016 than 2012.

The GOP figure if they can’t win fairly, cheat...

https://www.washingtonpost.com/local/virginia-politics/a-republican-congressman-helped-a-rival-collect-signatures-to-get-on-the-ballot-some-of-those-signatures-were-fake/2018/09/04/3e1c439c-b049-11e8-9a6a-565d92a3585d_story.html

[facilitatorn]

Red thinking his party actually wins elections and has public support is just so much sadder than when he was simply clinging to his god and his guns. Red has never been strong enough to get to the truth. Now he’s just pitiful.

[facilitatorn]

http://www.salon.com/2018/09/05/they-are-not-white-nationalists-they-are-white-supremacists/

Achtung?

[josh]

http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2018/09/new-york-times-op-ed-anonymous-trump-white-house-official-resistance-ethics.html?utm_campaign=nym&utm_source=fb&utm_medium=s1

The person who wrote the op-ed in the NYT is a moral coward.

[facilitatorn]

Question for Kavanaugh tomorrow;

If a sitting president orders the illegal assassination of a head of state, what legal consequences should follow according to our constitution?

[josh]

Question for Kavanaugh tomorrow;

If a sitting president orders the illegal assassination of a head of state, what legal consequences should follow according to our constitution?

I think it has to be asked without the word "illegal" in it to have a ghost of a chance of being answered.