No quid pro quo
NEEDS upset - makes attempt to justify his feelings
A quid pro quo is not required.
Not debating that one way or the other
It's not a debate.
It's not a question.
It's not a matter of opinion.
Asking and/or accepting foreign interference in the campaign is against the law. How many times do you need that spelled out for you before you accept the truth of it?
And, again, why are you supporting the practice of inviting foreign interference in the elections?!
What the fuck are you talking about?
You.
Foreign interference in our elections.
A president who has admitted asking a foreign government to interfere in our elections,
regardless of quid pro quo.
Your ongoing support of him and refusal to come to grips with the fact that the president did that, while pretending there is a "debate" to which you get to pick a side.
It happened - the president did it.
It's illegal, as pointed out by the chair of the FEC.
Why are you supporting the practice of inviting foreign interference in the elections?!