All?
All?
That's convenient to believe, but ignores a multitude of other factors.
Even so, the change is about CONVINCING THE MAJORITY to change, and telling them to pony up SOLELY based on race is a non-starter for about 75% of the population you wish to sway.
You fund whatever initiatives you finally decide on to address racism and racial inequities through a wealth tax that is based on a numeric calculation of net wealth and or real property and or corporate earnings, and is thus race blind in terms of ponying up.
You are harvesting funds from all those who fairly have the good fortune to qualify to provide for the needs of a smaller subset with a particular need just as we do for veteran’s benefits, social security, and fossil fuel subsidies or flood insurance.
I'm okay with addressing racial inequities. But how do we define them? Who defines them? When you start ticking off "numeric calculations of net worth and real property", now you are talking wealth redistribution on a very large scale, it seems.
So tell me how you would calculate that. Because I can tell you right now the IRS doesn't do that fairly or equitably. $100000 in Kansas aint the same as $100000 in NY or NJ, but it gets taxed the same by Uncle Sam.