Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[kidcarter8]

More Dem fun

https://twitter.com/erinscafe/status/1090379746821603329

https://twitter.com/elianayjohnson/status/1090384930817933312

[kidcarter8]

I refer you all to Heisenberg's uncertainty principle.  The hotter the candidate, the less determined their age.  And AOC is smokin'.  She can libre my nachos anytime.

Yeah....

saw her on whythelongface.com

[REDSTATEWARD]

Is exploding the deficit "basically conservative" or does that make him a "socialist cocksucker?"

You might want to read up on Howard Schultz.  He puts the deficit at the top of his list of problems to solve.
Don't worry, I won't tell him you are a democrat.
LOL

aka: "I'm not going to answer your question, let alone honestly, because it exposes me for the hypocrite that I am. Let's change the topic."

Mark Cuban had the line of the day for the Josh Toadies of the democrats

If 21 months before an election you don’t believe your candidate’s platform is strong enough to win an election with independent candidates, you might want to rethink who you support.

I'm pretty sure all my toadies are supporting other candidates.

And there is a reason I support Ranked Choice Voting - it prevents a candidate from winning with 35% of the vote.

And allows the possibility of a 30 per cent winner with no mandate.
Might work for Dog Warden, not for a President.

[whiskeypriest]

I notice you quoted no statistics on the state of the economy.

LOL.  I sincerely hope you are being ironic here.

Not only do you not understand the state of our economy you don't know the meaning of irony.

LOL again.  Guess you weren’t being ironic.

REDSTATEWARD, I inserted that last line for good reason.  In the past when I pointed out that there has been no Trump bump in the economic numbers (and in fact the Obama economy outperformed the period when Trump has been in charge when it came to job creation) your response has only been that if Obama’s economy was so solid, Hillary Clinton would have been elected.

Obvious to everyone, I guess, but you.

You know who else it is not obvious to? The idiot who keeps blathering about how the reason Clinton lost was because he called him and his fellow racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamaphobic Trump supporters deplorable. It might be ESPN who makes that claim, but I am not sure.

[REDSTATEWARD]

I notice you quoted no statistics on the state of the economy.

LOL.  I sincerely hope you are being ironic here.

Not only do you not understand the state of our economy you don't know the meaning of irony.

LOL again.  Guess you weren’t being ironic.

REDSTATEWARD, I inserted that last line for good reason.  In the past when I pointed out that there has been no Trump bump in the economic numbers (and in fact the Obama economy outperformed the period when Trump has been in charge when it came to job creation) your response has only been that if Obama’s economy was so solid, Hillary Clinton would have been elected.

Obvious to everyone, I guess, but you.

You know who else it is not obvious to? The idiot who keeps blathering about how the reason Clinton lost was because he called him and his fellow racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamaphobic Trump supporters deplorable. It might be ESPN who makes that claim, but I am not sure.

Time to let it go.  Obama was the main reason for Clinton's loss.  She compounded his effect by the deplorable comments. 

[kidcarter8]

heh

https://twitter.com/TVMoJoe/status/1090388167612452864

abrams

[josh]

Is exploding the deficit "basically conservative" or does that make him a "socialist cocksucker?"

You might want to read up on Howard Schultz.  He puts the deficit at the top of his list of problems to solve.
Don't worry, I won't tell him you are a democrat.
LOL

aka: "I'm not going to answer your question, let alone honestly, because it exposes me for the hypocrite that I am. Let's change the topic."

Mark Cuban had the line of the day for the Josh Toadies of the democrats

If 21 months before an election you don’t believe your candidate’s platform is strong enough to win an election with independent candidates, you might want to rethink who you support.

I'm pretty sure all my toadies are supporting other candidates.

And there is a reason I support Ranked Choice Voting - it prevents a candidate from winning with 35% of the vote.

And allows the possibility of a 30 per cent winner with no mandate.
Might work for Dog Warden, not for a President.

See also the fool who got a minority of the popular vote and thought he had a mandate. (Or Bambi, who also thinks that constituted a mandate.)

[josh]

I notice you quoted no statistics on the state of the economy.

LOL.  I sincerely hope you are being ironic here.

Not only do you not understand the state of our economy you don't know the meaning of irony.

LOL again.  Guess you weren’t being ironic.

REDSTATEWARD, I inserted that last line for good reason.  In the past when I pointed out that there has been no Trump bump in the economic numbers (and in fact the Obama economy outperformed the period when Trump has been in charge when it came to job creation) your response has only been that if Obama’s economy was so solid, Hillary Clinton would have been elected.

Obvious to everyone, I guess, but you.

You know who else it is not obvious to? The idiot who keeps blathering about how the reason Clinton lost was because he called him and his fellow racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamaphobic Trump supporters deplorable. It might be ESPN who makes that claim, but I am not sure.

Time to let it go.  Obama was the main reason for Clinton's loss.  She compounded his effect by the deplorable comments.

Time to let it go.

[b[Comey[/b] was the #2 reason for Clinton's loss.

Sexism was the #1 reason.

[josh]

Is exploding the deficit "basically conservative" or does that make him a "socialist cocksucker?"

You might want to read up on Howard Schultz.  He puts the deficit at the top of his list of problems to solve.
Don't worry, I won't tell him you are a democrat.
LOL

aka: "I'm not going to answer your question, let alone honestly, because it exposes me for the hypocrite that I am. Let's change the topic."

Mark Cuban had the line of the day for the Josh Toadies of the democrats

If 21 months before an election you don’t believe your candidate’s platform is strong enough to win an election with independent candidates, you might want to rethink who you support.

And btw, I note that you still don't want to answer the question!

[kidcarter8]

https://twitter.com/PoppyHarlowCNN/status/1090386630387605504

[REDSTATEWARD]

Is exploding the deficit "basically conservative" or does that make him a "socialist cocksucker?"

You might want to read up on Howard Schultz.  He puts the deficit at the top of his list of problems to solve.
Don't worry, I won't tell him you are a democrat.
LOL

aka: "I'm not going to answer your question, let alone honestly, because it exposes me for the hypocrite that I am. Let's change the topic."

Mark Cuban had the line of the day for the Josh Toadies of the democrats

If 21 months before an election you don’t believe your candidate’s platform is strong enough to win an election with independent candidates, you might want to rethink who you support.

And btw, I note that you still don't want to answer the question!

Mark Cuban had an answer in the form of a question.

[kidcarter8]

https://twitter.com/DanCrenshawTX/status/1090428170506067969

[REDSTATEWARD]

I notice you quoted no statistics on the state of the economy.

LOL.  I sincerely hope you are being ironic here.

Not only do you not understand the state of our economy you don't know the meaning of irony.

LOL again.  Guess you weren’t being ironic.

REDSTATEWARD, I inserted that last line for good reason.  In the past when I pointed out that there has been no Trump bump in the economic numbers (and in fact the Obama economy outperformed the period when Trump has been in charge when it came to job creation) your response has only been that if Obama’s economy was so solid, Hillary Clinton would have been elected.

Obvious to everyone, I guess, but you.

You know who else it is not obvious to? The idiot who keeps blathering about how the reason Clinton lost was because he called him and his fellow racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic and Islamaphobic Trump supporters deplorable. It might be ESPN who makes that claim, but I am not sure.

Time to let it go.  Obama was the main reason for Clinton's loss.  She compounded his effect by the deplorable comments.

Time to let it go.

[b[Comey[/b] was the #2 reason for Clinton's loss.

Sexism was the #1 reason.

But, but, but...........She won the popular vote!

[josh]

Is exploding the deficit "basically conservative" or does that make him a "socialist cocksucker?"

You might want to read up on Howard Schultz.  He puts the deficit at the top of his list of problems to solve.
Don't worry, I won't tell him you are a democrat.
LOL

aka: "I'm not going to answer your question, let alone honestly, because it exposes me for the hypocrite that I am. Let's change the topic."

Mark Cuban had the line of the day for the Josh Toadies of the democrats

If 21 months before an election you don’t believe your candidate’s platform is strong enough to win an election with independent candidates, you might want to rethink who you support.

And btw, I note that you still don't want to answer the question!

Mark Cuban had an answer in the form of a question.

No.

YOU were asked about your position on the deficit.

You have dodged and dodged.

[REDSTATEWARD]

Is exploding the deficit "basically conservative" or does that make him a "socialist cocksucker?"

You might want to read up on Howard Schultz.  He puts the deficit at the top of his list of problems to solve.
Don't worry, I won't tell him you are a democrat.
LOL

aka: "I'm not going to answer your question, let alone honestly, because it exposes me for the hypocrite that I am. Let's change the topic."

Mark Cuban had the line of the day for the Josh Toadies of the democrats

If 21 months before an election you don’t believe your candidate’s platform is strong enough to win an election with independent candidates, you might want to rethink who you support.

And btw, I note that you still don't want to answer the question!

Mark Cuban had an answer in the form of a question.

No.

YOU were asked about your position on the deficit.

You have dodged and dodged.

That was not the question that was asked.
But I do not like deficits.
But so what?