Total Members Voted: 9
Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM
Quote from: josh on July 26, 2019, 11:26:55 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 07:07:31 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after the RBG speaks is not a quote from her even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.LOLLOL = "I have no defense against that accusation, because it is totally true.What is the accusation?
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 07:07:31 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after the RBG speaks is not a quote from her even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.LOLLOL = "I have no defense against that accusation, because it is totally true.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after the RBG speaks is not a quote from her even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.LOL
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after the RBG speaks is not a quote from her even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.
The “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 11:36:46 PMQuote from: josh on July 26, 2019, 11:26:55 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 07:07:31 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after the RBG speaks is not a quote from her even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.LOLLOL = "I have no defense against that accusation, because it is totally true.What is the accusation?"What is the accusation?" = "If I don't admit that my failure has been accurately called out, I can continue to pretend I am never wrong."
Quote from: NeedsAdjustments on July 26, 2019, 05:37:25 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!Trump said he found Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford's testimony 'compelling' and called her 'a very credible witness' LOL! The only thing she remembered, when asked, was she only had one beer!
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!Trump said he found Kavanaugh accuser Christine Blasey Ford's testimony 'compelling' and called her 'a very credible witness'
Quote from: josh on July 26, 2019, 11:43:24 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 11:36:46 PMQuote from: josh on July 26, 2019, 11:26:55 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 07:07:31 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after the RBG speaks is not a quote from her even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.LOLLOL = "I have no defense against that accusation, because it is totally true.What is the accusation?"What is the accusation?" = "If I don't admit that my failure has been accurately called out, I can continue to pretend I am never wrong."Oh.RBG was right and you disagree?
Trump stands condemned......the premeditated, cold-blooded, deliberate killing of human beings in US Federal death chambers is to resume soon.
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 27, 2019, 12:16:55 AMQuote from: josh on July 26, 2019, 11:43:24 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 11:36:46 PMQuote from: josh on July 26, 2019, 11:26:55 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 07:07:31 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 05:30:10 PMThe “ notorious RBG “ speaks;Court packing through an act of Congress would be constitutional, as the Constitution does not mandate a specific number of Supreme Court justices. However, it would still undermine the stability of our republic while making the Supreme Court as partisan as could be, and it has historically been avoided for that reason. If one party packs the court upon taking power, the opposing party could pack the court even more once it returns to power. Democrats who support the practice are foolishly thinking about their short-term policy interests alone and suffering from tunnel vision.Ginsburg further upset leftist radicals this week when she praised Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Brett Kavanaugh as "decent and smart." Earlier in the month, she applauded Kavanaugh specifically because his staff is entirely female, and the Supreme Court now has more female law clerks than male law clerks for the first time in history. There is a very important first on the Supreme Court this term, and it's thanks to our new justice, Justice Kavanaugh," Ginsburg's comments serve as a stark contrast to the absurd character assassination Kavanaugh faced from leftists last year.Long may she live!In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after the RBG speaks is not a quote from her even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.LOLLOL = "I have no defense against that accusation, because it is totally true.What is the accusation?"What is the accusation?" = "If I don't admit that my failure has been accurately called out, I can continue to pretend I am never wrong."Oh.RBG was right and you disagree?You faked it to make it look like a quote from her.And you won't own up to it.
Quote from: LarryBnDC on July 26, 2019, 10:52:53 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 10:49:10 PMQuote from: LarryBnDC on July 26, 2019, 08:22:14 PMWell, here we are...https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2019/04/22/report-shifts-focus-to-wary-democrats-now-weighing-trump-impeachment-prospects/2020 is the only way to remove Trump from office [/i]Adam Schiff- erstwhile impeachment guru of the democrat party following the Mueller debacle before Congress hearings.Did you happen to notice the date of publication? Yes. Glad you asked. Maybe you are finally paying attention.
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on July 26, 2019, 10:49:10 PMQuote from: LarryBnDC on July 26, 2019, 08:22:14 PMWell, here we are...https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2019/04/22/report-shifts-focus-to-wary-democrats-now-weighing-trump-impeachment-prospects/2020 is the only way to remove Trump from office [/i]Adam Schiff- erstwhile impeachment guru of the democrat party following the Mueller debacle before Congress hearings.Did you happen to notice the date of publication?
Quote from: LarryBnDC on July 26, 2019, 08:22:14 PMWell, here we are...https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2019/04/22/report-shifts-focus-to-wary-democrats-now-weighing-trump-impeachment-prospects/2020 is the only way to remove Trump from office [/i]Adam Schiff- erstwhile impeachment guru of the democrat party following the Mueller debacle before Congress hearings.
Well, here we are...https://exjournalistsunite.wordpress.com/2019/04/22/report-shifts-focus-to-wary-democrats-now-weighing-trump-impeachment-prospects/
Quote from: Barton on July 26, 2019, 09:17:58 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMIn case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after "the notorious RBG speaks" is not a quote from her, even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.He tried the same exact trick a few weeks ago. I would say "lack of honesty," you don't need to qualify with "intellectual." Interesting that he sees Leftists only as either "absurd character assassins" or as the notably gracious Ms Ginsburg. I think the word best associated with the “ Notorious RBG is “ honesty” which really pisses you off.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on July 26, 2019, 06:42:40 PMIn case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after "the notorious RBG speaks" is not a quote from her, even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.He tried the same exact trick a few weeks ago. I would say "lack of honesty," you don't need to qualify with "intellectual." Interesting that he sees Leftists only as either "absurd character assassins" or as the notably gracious Ms Ginsburg.
In case there were any here who doubted Red's stunning lack of intellectual honesty,.the italicized quote after "the notorious RBG speaks" is not a quote from her, even though it is deliberately designed to appear that way. It is a quote from an editorial in the right wing Washington Examiner.