Total Members Voted: 9
Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM
Quote from: NeedsAdjustments on September 19, 2019, 02:48:12 PMQuote from: kiidcarter8 on September 19, 2019, 02:13:58 PMhttps://www.npr.org/2019/09/19/759761114/with-abortion-restrictions-on-the-rise-some-women-induce-their-ownWhen Arlen found out she was pregnant this year, she was still finishing college and knew she didn't want a child....Well...was she on birth control?Did they use a condom?Was this an immaculate conception?Or has the women's rights movement given the go ahead to just sleep around aimlessly without regards to consequence?Because obviously those consequences and the fault for them are entirely on the woman.Decision is always the woman's, except in cases of rape.
Quote from: kiidcarter8 on September 19, 2019, 02:13:58 PMhttps://www.npr.org/2019/09/19/759761114/with-abortion-restrictions-on-the-rise-some-women-induce-their-ownWhen Arlen found out she was pregnant this year, she was still finishing college and knew she didn't want a child....Well...was she on birth control?Did they use a condom?Was this an immaculate conception?Or has the women's rights movement given the go ahead to just sleep around aimlessly without regards to consequence?Because obviously those consequences and the fault for them are entirely on the woman.
https://www.npr.org/2019/09/19/759761114/with-abortion-restrictions-on-the-rise-some-women-induce-their-ownWhen Arlen found out she was pregnant this year, she was still finishing college and knew she didn't want a child....Well...was she on birth control?Did they use a condom?Was this an immaculate conception?Or has the women's rights movement given the go ahead to just sleep around aimlessly without regards to consequence?
Quote from: kiidcarter8 on September 19, 2019, 03:03:33 PMYou are so far off its comicalBut thanks for playing, Cousin AmityYou consume and regurgitate Fox News here almost daily and worship the "personalities" that feed you, while questioning if the NYTimes and CNN have bias.I am spot fucking on, "bro."
You are so far off its comicalBut thanks for playing, Cousin Amity
Quote from: kiidcarter8 on September 19, 2019, 03:05:28 PMQuote from: NeedsAdjustments on September 19, 2019, 02:48:12 PMQuote from: kiidcarter8 on September 19, 2019, 02:13:58 PMhttps://www.npr.org/2019/09/19/759761114/with-abortion-restrictions-on-the-rise-some-women-induce-their-ownWhen Arlen found out she was pregnant this year, she was still finishing college and knew she didn't want a child....Well...was she on birth control?Did they use a condom?Was this an immaculate conception?Or has the women's rights movement given the go ahead to just sleep around aimlessly without regards to consequence?Because obviously those consequences and the fault for them are entirely on the woman.Decision is always the woman's, except in cases of rape.Whose dick is she using?
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on September 19, 2019, 01:10:32 PMA recent Harvard/Harris Poll of 2,531 registered voters used no names in presenting two agendas by potential candidates for President. Here’s the text:Which candidate are you more likely to vote for:1.“A presidential candidate who stands for the green new deal on climate change, Medicare for all, free college tuition, opening our borders to many more immigrants and raising taxes to pay for these programs.Or …2. A presidential candidate who stands for lower taxes and reduced government regulations, strengthening our military, strengthening our border to reduce illegal immigrants, standing up more to China and Iran and seeking better trade deals for the US. The result: 61% say they’d vote for Agenda 2 including 65% of Independents and every other age group except those aged18-34 who split 50-50. https://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/HHP_August2019_Crosstabs_RegisteredVoters.pdfJust curious, in the PDF file you posted, where is that particular question phrasing? Because the phrasing sounds like a crude push-poll, rather than anything remotely scientific.I'll wait. Just a page number is fine. dumdedumdedumdedumde.....
A recent Harvard/Harris Poll of 2,531 registered voters used no names in presenting two agendas by potential candidates for President. Here’s the text:Which candidate are you more likely to vote for:1.“A presidential candidate who stands for the green new deal on climate change, Medicare for all, free college tuition, opening our borders to many more immigrants and raising taxes to pay for these programs.Or …2. A presidential candidate who stands for lower taxes and reduced government regulations, strengthening our military, strengthening our border to reduce illegal immigrants, standing up more to China and Iran and seeking better trade deals for the US. The result: 61% say they’d vote for Agenda 2 including 65% of Independents and every other age group except those aged18-34 who split 50-50. https://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/HHP_August2019_Crosstabs_RegisteredVoters.pdf
https://twitter.com/RexChapman/status/1174761856331866119heh
Quote from: kiidcarter8 on September 19, 2019, 03:05:28 PMDecision is always the woman's, except in cases of rape.And its always on her to consider the consequences.Quote from: kiidcarter8 on September 19, 2019, 03:05:28 PMThis is what we teach our boys, right?If you have boys I shudder to think what you teach them.
Decision is always the woman's, except in cases of rape.
This is what we teach our boys, right?
Quote from: Barton on September 19, 2019, 01:32:57 PMEVERYONE: I would factcheck Red's claim that the quoted text he cited today is actually from a Harris Poll questionnaire. I can find it nowhere in the PDF that he posted, nor in other online sources on the August 2019 Harvard/Harris Poll. If he or someone else cannot produce the link which shows the poll question actually phrased this way, then I would ask Kid to acknowledge that it would be legitimate to dismiss that post.What does it have to do with me?
EVERYONE: I would factcheck Red's claim that the quoted text he cited today is actually from a Harris Poll questionnaire. I can find it nowhere in the PDF that he posted, nor in other online sources on the August 2019 Harvard/Harris Poll. If he or someone else cannot produce the link which shows the poll question actually phrased this way, then I would ask Kid to acknowledge that it would be legitimate to dismiss that post.
HehGood stuff, RSW
HehGood stuff, RSW l
A recent Harvard/Harris Poll of 2,531 registered voters used no names in presenting two agendas by potential candidates for President.
Or has the women's rights movement given the go ahead to just sleep around aimlessly without regards to consequence?