Uninformed first Impression.
I tend to believe Hilary.
I also believe Gabbard when she says that Hil is a queen of War monger.... blah blah blah. I think it is smart strategy for her to pop in the polls if she has some hill to climb, so to speak.
Also, it's not like Hilary to tear someone down without some sort of evidence; and it would be wrong of her to do so. (Not that I haven't been disappointed by the Clintons before.) She knows that, she knows what sticking her neck out does. She knows what falsely accusing someone would do to her "legacy." She is not that cra!
Hil is that personification because it is generationally convenient to leave that stuff on her (stuff that was outrageous when she did it be not before, and not after!) We in our generation are kind of willing to let her carry that luggage for us, so we can pretend it's not ours. In the next generation it's more a case of "Ewwwww; old people stuff! Get it away!"
Trumpelstilskin, it's funny 'cause it's true!
PLAU
Me