Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

Reports of protests are overblown. A few incidents around the country, but nothing major.

5 (45.5%)

A few major incidents in capitals, but nothing much in DC.

5 (45.5%)

A major incident in DC, but nothing much around the country.

0 (0%)

More than 10 capitals have major upheavals, but nothing much in DC.

0 (0%)

A major incident in DC plus more than 10 capitals with significant upheavals.

1 (9.1%)

More than half the capitals around the country have problems with protesters, but DC is quiet.

0 (0%)

DC has major problems, while more than half the capitals around the country also have considerable trouble with protesters.

0 (0%)

Huge disruption to the day.

0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 9

Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM

[REDSTATEWARD]

No evidence of a larger conspiracy

- which is what many of you stood by all along.

Just repeating something a second time does not make it any less wrong.

Mueller today: The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign's response to this activity as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

Insufficient evidence is not no evidence. 

Well done

Could not say whether a crime was/was not committed (NOT 100% CLEARED but couldn't be charged anyway)

Did say there was no broader conspiracy (CLEARED)

At the top of the issue, I think there is a problem with saying he was "cleared" when there is documented evidence pointing toward conspiracy,

No evidence of guilt. None. Mueller said so. No Collusion. Case over.




 

[josh]

Just pointing out the nature of the beast, pal.

You have NO parallels, asshole.

How many bills is she holding out from a vote?

How many SCOTUS appointments did she prevent or lie about to the American people?

Eaaaaaaaasy, boy.

AKA "You're right, there are no parallels. There are no bills she is holding out." etc.

You are full of shit and unwilling to admit that your attempt at a parallel was even weaker than your reliance upon West Wing to "make points."

[josh]

Trash?  I don't throw out insults, you do.

That is such a laughable comment it is hard to stay on the couch.

You throw out plenty of insults on a regular and sustaining basis!

Perhaps before you read what the word "hypothetical" means you might try the word "insult."

[josh]

Just pointing out the nature of the beast, pal.

You have NO parallels, asshole.

How many bills is she holding out from a vote?

How many SCOTUS appointments did she prevent or lie about to the American people?

Eaaaaaaaasy, boy.

No reason to go easy on sellouts, sellout.

Tons of evidence of an espionage conspiracy, and even more evidence obstructed.

While Putin was getting it stiff, trump was bending over and greasing up. It takes two to tango. Three actually. Mitch was rimming anyone who’d let him, as senate republicans do as a rule.

Misplaced post.

Your brain is misplaced, Kiiid.

[josh]

No evidence of a larger conspiracy

- which is what many of you stood by all along.

You have not read the report, I take it.

Evidence is there aplenty. Is there proof? That is for a court to decide. And did the president participate? That is currently for the House to offer an opinion on and then the Senate.

But claiming there is no evidence is... the sort of absurdity that is common from you.

[josh]

Just love the phrase, "all but said..."

It's indicative of grasping at straws.

"Mueller all but said (today)........that his findings were mischaracterized"

Uh-huh.

While ignoring that he very clearly (and without interpretation) made clear there was evidence of conspiracy.

[josh]

No evidence of a larger conspiracy

- which is what many of you stood by all along.

Just repeating something a second time does not make it any less wrong.

Mueller today: The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign's response to this activity as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

Insufficient evidence is not no evidence. 

Well done

Could not say whether a crime was/was not committed (NOT 100% CLEARED but couldn't be charged anyway)

Did say there was no broader conspiracy (CLEARED)

No, did not say that.

Said "insufficienet evidence to prove..." If he'd cleared it, he would have said he cleared it. NOWHERE does he say "there was no conspracy.

Strikes me as "indicative of grasping at straws" by you.

[REDSTATEWARD]

Trash?  I don't throw out insults, you do.

That is such a laughable comment it is hard to stay on the couch.

You throw out plenty of insults on a regular and sustaining basis!

Perhaps before you read what the word "hypothetical" means you might try the word "insult."

Not a problem.

[josh]

No evidence of a larger conspiracy

- which is what many of you stood by all along.

Just repeating something a second time does not make it any less wrong.

Mueller today: The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign's response to this activity as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

Insufficient evidence is not no evidence. 

Well done

Could not say whether a crime was/was not committed (NOT 100% CLEARED but couldn't be charged anyway)

Did say there was no broader conspiracy (CLEARED)

At the top of the issue, I think there is a problem with saying he was "cleared" when there is documented evidence pointing toward conspiracy,

No evidence of guilt. None. Mueller said so. No Collusion. Case over.

Listening to you twist what he said to suit your purposes is hilarious, you disloyal failure of an American!

He did NOT say "no evidence of guilt." He did NOT say "No Collusion."

You are still and again full of shit, about this as well as so many other things. You are an amoral hypocrite and a traitor.

[REDSTATEWARD]

No evidence of a larger conspiracy

- which is what many of you stood by all along.

Just repeating something a second time does not make it any less wrong.

Mueller today: The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign's response to this activity as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

Insufficient evidence is not no evidence. 

Well done

Could not say whether a crime was/was not committed (NOT 100% CLEARED but couldn't be charged anyway)

Did say there was no broader conspiracy (CLEARED)

No, did not say that.

Said "insufficienet evidence to prove..." If he'd cleared it, he would have said he cleared it. NOWHERE does he say "there was no conspracy.

If aprosecutor cannot indict then the person under investigation is presumed innocent.
AS he or she is before any investigation.  Most kids learn that in High School.

[josh]

No evidence of a larger conspiracy

- which is what many of you stood by all along.

Just repeating something a second time does not make it any less wrong.

Mueller today: The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign's response to this activity as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

Insufficient evidence is not no evidence. 

Well done

Could not say whether a crime was/was not committed (NOT 100% CLEARED but couldn't be charged anyway)

Did say there was no broader conspiracy (CLEARED)

No, did not say that.

Said "insufficienet evidence to prove..." If he'd cleared it, he would have said he cleared it. NOWHERE does he say "there was no conspracy.

If aprosecutor cannot indict then the person under investigation is presumed innocent.
AS he or she is before any investigation.  Most kids learn that in High School.

But since Mueller was clear that he was not going to be Trump's prosecutor, your analogy is worthless.

(Mind you, I acknowledge the miracle of your coming up with one at all, even though flawed.)

[kiidcarter8]

"People like you that like that we have a racist president..."

Now, now....  eaaaaaasy.

[kiidcarter8]

Just pointing out the nature of the beast, pal.

You have NO parallels, asshole.

How many bills is she holding out from a vote?

How many SCOTUS appointments did she prevent or lie about to the American people?

Eaaaaaaaasy, boy.

No reason to go easy on sellouts, sellout.

Tons of evidence of an espionage conspiracy, and even more evidence obstructed.

While Putin was getting it stiff, trump was bending over and greasing up. It takes two to tango. Three actually. Mitch was rimming anyone who’d let him, as senate republicans do as a rule.

Misplaced post.

Your brain is misplaced, Kiiid.

I think you need about a week off from this board.

[REDSTATEWARD]

No evidence of a larger conspiracy

- which is what many of you stood by all along.

Just repeating something a second time does not make it any less wrong.

Mueller today: The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign's response to this activity as well as our conclusion that there was insufficient evidence to charge a broader conspiracy.

Insufficient evidence is not no evidence. 

Well done

Could not say whether a crime was/was not committed (NOT 100% CLEARED but couldn't be charged anyway)

Did say there was no broader conspiracy (CLEARED)

No, did not say that.

Said "insufficienet evidence to prove..." If he'd cleared it, he would have said he cleared it. NOWHERE does he say "there was no conspracy.

If aprosecutor cannot indict then the person under investigation is presumed innocent.
AS he or she is before any investigation.  Most kids learn that in High School.

But since Mueller was clear that he was not going to be Trump's prosecutor, your analogy is worthless.

The words 'special prosecutor' seem to confuse you.

[josh]

Just pointing out the nature of the beast, pal.

You have NO parallels, asshole.

How many bills is she holding out from a vote?

How many SCOTUS appointments did she prevent or lie about to the American people?

Eaaaaaaaasy, boy.

No reason to go easy on sellouts, sellout.

Tons of evidence of an espionage conspiracy, and even more evidence obstructed.

While Putin was getting it stiff, trump was bending over and greasing up. It takes two to tango. Three actually. Mitch was rimming anyone who’d let him, as senate republicans do as a rule.

Misplaced post.

Your brain is misplaced, Kiiid.

I think you need about a week off from this board.

I think you need to grow a brain and a heart, Kiiid, but I don't expect it to happen.

Did you base your opinion on me from something on West Wing or are you falling back on your Hee Haw expertise?