Total Members Voted: 9
Voting closed: January 19, 2021, 10:49:21 PM
WHO stands by recommendation to not wear masks if you are not sick"There is no specific evidence to suggest that the wearing of masks by the mass population has any potential benefit. In fact, there's some evidence to suggest the opposite in the misuse of wearing a mask properly or fitting it properly," Dr. Mike Ryan, WHO executive director of health emergencies program, said during a media briefing in Geneva on Monday.====="In the community, we do not recommend the use of wearing masks unless you yourself are sick and as a measure to prevent onward spread from you if you are ill," Van Kerkhove said. "The masks that we recommend are for people who are at home and who are sick and for those individuals who are caring for those people who are home that are sick."
Trump Increases Hostility Toward Reporters Questioning His Handling Of Coronavirus Crisishttps://www.huffpost.com/entry/trump-increases-hostility-reporters-questioning-coronavirus-crisis_n_5e8132c7c5b661492269b1b7LEADER!
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 06:16:29 PMQuote from: Yankguy1 on March 30, 2020, 06:10:12 PMOh. Well you said that Commerce Clause gives states that authority. You need to write better.The Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. I stand by what I wrote.But you do not understand.And like your fearful leader, you cannot admit when you make a mistake.Nothing new.
Quote from: Yankguy1 on March 30, 2020, 06:10:12 PMOh. Well you said that Commerce Clause gives states that authority. You need to write better.The Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. I stand by what I wrote.
Oh. Well you said that Commerce Clause gives states that authority. You need to write better.
Great to see the good results from anti-virals - even as the trials await official resultWaiting fort he trial to conclude would have been ill advised.
"Our testing is BETTER than any country in the world"- TrumpThoughts?
Credit this president for continuing to call on Ms Alcindor and Mr Acosta at these briefings.Today wasn't pretty - and you can argue whether or not it was necessary - they got slapped pretty good. We can only hope the questions improve.
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 06:34:36 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 06:23:03 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 06:11:44 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:39:07 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:36:11 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 04:20:46 PMQuote from: josh on March 30, 2020, 03:50:50 PMSo, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1QThe Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. on that basis I would says states have Constitutional authority. At the state level public health safety seems to take precedence. Ohio postponed the democrat primary election citing the threat to health by the corona virus, basically ignoring a judge’s ruling to the contrary. Further the state’s rescheduled election will prohibit in person voting. And Ohio was among the first states to close non essential businesses, schools, etc. I don’t know if Texas accords the state the same power in overseeing public health.Every time Red mentions the Commerce Clause, I think of Indigo Montoya. You keep using that phrase. I dont think it means what you think it means.For what it is worth, the 10th Amendment would not give the States the right to quarantine either. Of course it does. QuoteNeither it nor the Commerce Clause grant the states any rights they did not already have.LOLLaugh away. It is your away of admitting I am right.About what?No fish for you!
Quote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 06:23:03 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 06:11:44 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:39:07 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:36:11 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 04:20:46 PMQuote from: josh on March 30, 2020, 03:50:50 PMSo, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1QThe Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. on that basis I would says states have Constitutional authority. At the state level public health safety seems to take precedence. Ohio postponed the democrat primary election citing the threat to health by the corona virus, basically ignoring a judge’s ruling to the contrary. Further the state’s rescheduled election will prohibit in person voting. And Ohio was among the first states to close non essential businesses, schools, etc. I don’t know if Texas accords the state the same power in overseeing public health.Every time Red mentions the Commerce Clause, I think of Indigo Montoya. You keep using that phrase. I dont think it means what you think it means.For what it is worth, the 10th Amendment would not give the States the right to quarantine either. Of course it does. QuoteNeither it nor the Commerce Clause grant the states any rights they did not already have.LOLLaugh away. It is your away of admitting I am right.About what?
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 06:11:44 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:39:07 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:36:11 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 04:20:46 PMQuote from: josh on March 30, 2020, 03:50:50 PMSo, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1QThe Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. on that basis I would says states have Constitutional authority. At the state level public health safety seems to take precedence. Ohio postponed the democrat primary election citing the threat to health by the corona virus, basically ignoring a judge’s ruling to the contrary. Further the state’s rescheduled election will prohibit in person voting. And Ohio was among the first states to close non essential businesses, schools, etc. I don’t know if Texas accords the state the same power in overseeing public health.Every time Red mentions the Commerce Clause, I think of Indigo Montoya. You keep using that phrase. I dont think it means what you think it means.For what it is worth, the 10th Amendment would not give the States the right to quarantine either. Of course it does. QuoteNeither it nor the Commerce Clause grant the states any rights they did not already have.LOLLaugh away. It is your away of admitting I am right.
Quote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:39:07 PMQuote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:36:11 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 04:20:46 PMQuote from: josh on March 30, 2020, 03:50:50 PMSo, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1QThe Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. on that basis I would says states have Constitutional authority. At the state level public health safety seems to take precedence. Ohio postponed the democrat primary election citing the threat to health by the corona virus, basically ignoring a judge’s ruling to the contrary. Further the state’s rescheduled election will prohibit in person voting. And Ohio was among the first states to close non essential businesses, schools, etc. I don’t know if Texas accords the state the same power in overseeing public health.Every time Red mentions the Commerce Clause, I think of Indigo Montoya. You keep using that phrase. I dont think it means what you think it means.For what it is worth, the 10th Amendment would not give the States the right to quarantine either. Of course it does. QuoteNeither it nor the Commerce Clause grant the states any rights they did not already have.LOL
Quote from: Hairy Lime on March 30, 2020, 05:36:11 PMQuote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 04:20:46 PMQuote from: josh on March 30, 2020, 03:50:50 PMSo, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1QThe Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. on that basis I would says states have Constitutional authority. At the state level public health safety seems to take precedence. Ohio postponed the democrat primary election citing the threat to health by the corona virus, basically ignoring a judge’s ruling to the contrary. Further the state’s rescheduled election will prohibit in person voting. And Ohio was among the first states to close non essential businesses, schools, etc. I don’t know if Texas accords the state the same power in overseeing public health.Every time Red mentions the Commerce Clause, I think of Indigo Montoya. You keep using that phrase. I dont think it means what you think it means.For what it is worth, the 10th Amendment would not give the States the right to quarantine either.
Quote from: REDSTATEWARD on March 30, 2020, 04:20:46 PMQuote from: josh on March 30, 2020, 03:50:50 PMSo, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1QThe Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. on that basis I would says states have Constitutional authority. At the state level public health safety seems to take precedence. Ohio postponed the democrat primary election citing the threat to health by the corona virus, basically ignoring a judge’s ruling to the contrary. Further the state’s rescheduled election will prohibit in person voting. And Ohio was among the first states to close non essential businesses, schools, etc. I don’t know if Texas accords the state the same power in overseeing public health.Every time Red mentions the Commerce Clause, I think of Indigo Montoya. You keep using that phrase. I dont think it means what you think it means.
Quote from: josh on March 30, 2020, 03:50:50 PMSo, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1QThe Federal Government is restricted from national quarantines. The states not so much thanks to the 10th amendment and the Commerce Clause. on that basis I would says states have Constitutional authority. At the state level public health safety seems to take precedence. Ohio postponed the democrat primary election citing the threat to health by the corona virus, basically ignoring a judge’s ruling to the contrary. Further the state’s rescheduled election will prohibit in person voting. And Ohio was among the first states to close non essential businesses, schools, etc. I don’t know if Texas accords the state the same power in overseeing public health.
So, Ward - as our resident originalist and defended of all things Constitutional, what do you think of the claims, in NH and now in TX, that "stay-at-home" orders are unconstitutional?!https://www.houstonchronicle.com/news/houston-texas/houston/article/Texas-Supreme-Court-Harris-County-stay-at-home-15166758.php?utm_campaign=CMS+Sharing+Tools+%28Premium%29&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_medium=referral&fbclid=IwAR2gnRXo3C0i-Xs-gdj-VvjEO_yXTDhsoCUpwhLLO9Gt7ziPgkWajq7RD1Q
Neither it nor the Commerce Clause grant the states any rights they did not already have.
Florida sheriff charges pastor who kept megachurch open, said closings are for ‘pansies’Tampa-area law enforcement officials have arrested a local pastor who defied coronavirus-related bans on large gatherings and instead encouraged crowds as large as 500 people at one service this weekend, a sheriff said Monday....
Quote from: kiidcarter8 on March 30, 2020, 06:18:32 PMCredit this president for continuing to call on Ms Alcindor and Mr Acosta at these briefings.Today wasn't pretty - and you can argue whether or not it was necessary - they got slapped pretty good. We can only hope the questions improve.This ain’t North Korea, you fucking idiot!