Concern for the future tops need for punishment of the past.
Yes. President Trump's vision for the US and the world is ultra proper.
It’s all in the past, uh huh. Let’s move on. Except…Russia is suspected of assassinating a Chechen dissident in Berlin
yesterday. US intelligence has warned, repeatedly, that Russia is
actively looking to interfere in 2020. And as Bo points out, Russia’s illegal occupation of territories continues
today.But let’s talk about the past…
In the 2012 election then candidate Mitt Romney described Russia as the biggest threat to the United States out there, bigger than Islamic extremist terrorism. He was mocked by some at the time, but whatever you think of the truth of it, this was the position of the Republican Nominee for President of the United States seven years ago.
In 2014 Sen. John McCain wrote a column that was published in Russia in which he said that Putin “rules by corruption, repression and violence” and said that his regime was allied with “some of the world’s most offensive and threatening tyrannies.”
In 2017 the Republican-led Senate voted overwhelmingly to increase sanctions on Russia, 97-2. Republicans issued the statement “It’s time to respond to Russia’s attack on American democracy with strength, with resolve, with common purpose, and with action.”
In 2018 Lindsay Graham said that Russian interference in our election was “a big deal” and that “we need more sanctions, not less.”
That same year, Paul Ryan called Russia “a menacing government that does not share our interests and does not share our values.”
But now just a year later we should let bygones be bygones and accept Putin back into our good graces because it’s what Trump wants and we have no reason,
absolutely none, to think that despite its contradicting the long held position of his party, Trump’s position on Putin isn’t
“ultra proper.”You are too ridiculous kiidcarter8. I stand by my previous comments regarding your undying defense of the indefensible Trump; it’s pathetic.