"herd immunity", it is what Sweden is doing. the death toll is high for such a country....but the economy is strong.
Sweden, UK and Turkey all intended to go for herd immunity, just let the virus take its course. Then they realized how much death and suffering that would entail -- I called the British plan the Dead Granny strategy -- and all of them modified their initial stance and went with limited lockdowns.
The result:
UK with more cases and more deaths than any other Euro-country.
Sweden nearly 5000 deaths compared with 600 deaths in Finland and Norway combined -- which equalizes the population (10M to 11M combined). Sweden has mostly admitted they made a mistake with their initial do-little approach, and apparently they only managed something like 12% infection rate, far from the 60% or more needed in theory for herd immunity. Of course they gave up the strategy after a while and went with a halfway measure of mild voluntary lockdown. They realized it was going to be very destructive to get to herd immunity.
Turkey? Not sure what's going down there. But they are close to bumping Germany or Iran for the Top 10 in infections. And I wouldn't trust their numbers much, since everything there is controlled by Erdogan and his cronies.
I didn't realize that Peru was #8 in infections. closing in on Italy and Spain.
Chile #12 behind Turkey and ahead of France.
For SA, you mostly here about Brasil. Another country that thought they could do nothing and it would be okay. 2nd most cases, 2nd most deaths.
No country has had the stomach to fully try herd immunity. The countries that took few measures and thought they could just let the virus take its course have done terrible in terms of cases and deaths.